2 Apr
2009
2 Apr
'09
10:06 a.m.
Interestingly, rendering of lpe-knot has changed again. And to be honest the current behaviour looks more logical to me. So could someone (jfb?) have a look again?
jf barraud wrote:
IIRC, the lpe-knot reference is correct.
Cheers, jfb.
2009/4/1 Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@...528... mailto:th.v.d.gronde@...528...>
jf barraud wrote: Argh! right. lpe-knot for groups does not work :-( One bug is not directly in lpe-knot, but in the initialisation of the array parameter in the case of groups (which is wrong in some cases). So, who is right? The existing reference or the new output? Or neither?