Michael Wybrow wrote:
I think having a Universal Binary, or at least an Mactel version of 0.44 is *really* important. The later is a lot more feasible as it only requires someone with an Intel Mac to follow the existing packaging insructions and create a package. A Universal version will realistically require one of us Mac packager to have access to both a PPC and Intel Mac to sort out the process of creating Universal binaries, as well as testing early packages.
I have access to an Intel Mac running Tiger and have managed to get working packages of Inkscape SVN checkouts. If you'd like these, just drop me a line.
My interpretation of the Universal Binary tutorial at developer.apple.com (http://developer.apple.com/opensource/buildingopensourceuniversal.html) tells me that one can generate Universal Binaries with access to only one architecture provided that one also has appropriate Universal versions of all involved shared libraries. Am I reading this right?
Cheers, Michael
- David