El lun, 05-10-2015 a las 05:55 -0600, Brynn escribió:
If it's supposed to cover the images, maybe the words "family -friendly" should appear somewhere, as well as some sort of idea what it means. I understand that "family-friendly" has slightly different meanings between the east and the western parts of the world, especially regarding images or art.
I think "family-friendly" is a too loose concept, making it difficult to determine what falls inside and outside of the category. For instance, graphic violence is not "family-friendly" at all if you ask me. However, the depition of graphic violence in all kinds of media seems to be fine for everyone, unless it's too gory. Hypersexualization of female models isn't too family-friendly either, but it's pervasive in the fantasy and gaming imagery. Again, most of the people seem to be ok with that too.
I think that introducing the term "family-friendly" opens doors to different interpretations, and it might create controversies that aren't easy to solve, as different people will have different views on what is and what is not family-friendly.
"Pornographic" is a more straight-forward concept, and pornographic images are clearly not "family-friendly". Everyone will agree with that.
I think that Krzysztof's revision of the CoC is just fine. It's not redundant, it's clear and very easy to read and understand.
Gez