![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ad7c76b9aa8758315397d0dfb15fc222.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
21 Dec
2010
21 Dec
'10
7:31 p.m.
On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Jon Cruz wrote:
It's not an issue with the type itself. The calls that use it are all marked as "Since 2.6", and I'm pretty sure that 2.24.1 is newer than 2.6.
I just need to pinpoint an extra <include> to add.
Figured it out. The documentation lied, and that type was added post 2.24.
Fix is in as of revision 9972.