On Sep 16, 2005, at 7:28 PM, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Kees Cook wrote:
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:41:01 -0700 From: Kees Cook <inkscape@...62...> To: inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Inkscape-devel] Inkscape stats 9/15/05
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:34:18PM -0400, mental@...3... wrote:
We might want to consider "moving on" and looking to host a bugzilla somewhere. I've had a few situations where I thought "oh, damn, I can't do that in SF's tracker..."
(or some other kind; I just prefer bugzilla because I'm familiar with it)
No, bugzilla is just better ;)
Better for some things, but not for others.
My vote is definitely that for our main needs the SF tracker is OK. Not great, but OK.
In raw capability Bugzilla has more capabilities, but much of the complexity goes against some of our main needs, including a low barrier to entry for outsiders.
I've used many other systems over the years, and I think the basics are all there. So far I've not seen enough added value in switching to anything else. Yes, there are some benefits, but I've not seen enough to tip the balance.
Now, Mozilla is another matter. For them it might be good. However, if you'd like my opinions on much of that you'll have to ask me privately. (A bit off-topic for this list).