On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:35:55PM -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 17:05 -0700, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:21:47 +0100, jiho <jo.irisson@...400...> wrote:
I'm not sure there's really a need to continue counting points right now. It seems bazaar is the clear winner. Is there someone with a strong opinion about that? Who's organising the switch? ;)
Well, first I think we need to do a trial import into bzr to make sure that performance is acceptable?
I don't know what you define there, but I was curious. So I branched the import (10 minutes) changed the changelog and pushed it into a private branch (35 minutes). Made another change to the changelog and pushed it (15 seconds). The whole repository is about 80 MB and my DSL is 768/128.
Any other metrics?
To give another data point, I branched ted's branch (6m15.4s), modified the Changelog, committed locally (13.1s), registered a new branch that anyone on the Inkscape-Admin team can commit to, and then pushed up the new branch (39m19.8s). A local commit to Changelog took 2.8s, and push took 15.4 sec (these are more representative of day-to-day work). I then proposed to merge into Ted's branch. This is with Comcast cablemodem with similar up/down rates as ted.
I also gave it a try on an account on one of the canonical.com servers. branch: 46s, commit: 4.2s. So network performance seems to be a large driver.
Anyone got comparable numbers for git?
Bryce