MIT is GPL-compatible.  It&#39;s much more liberal than the GPL.  (And thus in my opinion is a far better license.)<br><br>It&#39;d probably be simpler to contact the chap who wrote it and arrange to get it under the GPL and under the umbrella of Inkscape rather than as a separate project, and kill off the Google Code one after that (we can even keep all seven revisions of its trunk history).<br>
<br>I imagine we&#39;d also want to change the ID of the extension from <span style="font-family: courier new,monospace;">bryhoyt.pixelsnap</span> as well.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Joshua A. Andler <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:scislac@...400...">scislac@...400...</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:56 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:<br>
&gt; Hi,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="http://code.google.com/p/pixelsnap/" target="_blank">http://code.google.com/p/pixelsnap/</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &quot;PixelSnap is an extension for Inkscape, an incredibly useful vector<br>
&gt; graphics app. It allows you to align rectangles &amp; paths to pixel<br>
&gt; boundaries, to create sharp web &amp; digital graphics.&quot;<br>
<br>
</div>Hmmm... given that I&#39;m not familiar with many open source licenses, will<br>
this be a political issue? I&#39;m basically wondering if this is deemed an<br>
issue by any of our developers to distribute something that is under an<br>
MIT license along with Inkscape (which as far as I know the rest of<br>
Inkscape is either GPL only or multi-licensed GPL+other stuff).<br></blockquote></div><br><br>-- Chris Morgan &lt;<a href="mailto:chris.morganiser@...233.....400...">chris.morganiser@...400...</a>&gt;<br><br><br>I&#39;m good at making two things: mistakes and enemies.<br>