On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:15:53 -0500, mental@...3... <mental@...3...> wrote:
Quoting gavinband@...663...:
Mine didn't get to the point of swapping, instead (watching top) I see that it rapidly uses up 55.5% or so of memory and then stops using any more (at least until I killed it). What machines you are running on? Mine is a 1700MHz Pentium M, 512Mb ram.
Mine is a 500MHz Celeron w/ 512MB RAM (n.b. I had some other memory-hungry things running at the time, hence the swapping).
And mine is Athlon 1200, also 512 MB RAM. But I also have a 2Gb swap partition, which may be the reason.
One other difference which would make it take longer for me is was that I was using recent CVS, which uses a virtual function to find the next sibling rather than directly accessing the field as 0.40 does.
Not likely, I use latest CVS too.
We are probably paying heavily for livarot's inefficiency versus Sodipodi's renderer here as well.
Not likely. Once it loads, it is scrollable and ediable as usual. Slow, but workable.