NP, see below.
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 15:55 +0100, Eric Greveson wrote:
I understand that DBus is asynchronous (which is great), but the existing extensions aren't! My point is that if you decide to make a DBus call half-way through an effect script which also modifies the document XML in the traditional inkex.Effect way.
Yeah. If you're going to do a dbus extension, don't actually put it in as an extension (inx file) until the extensions-system has been told how to deal with dbus based scripts. Otherwise you may end up with the document getting told two different things.
Idea: Perhaps we could develop a similar module to inkey but for the dbus side of it too. More data is needed from experimenters to see if this is worth spending time on.
Martin,