Next time, please reply to all recipients.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:40:12 -0500 From: john Culleton <John@...1202...> To: Shlomi Fish <shlomif@...2985...> Subject: Re: [Inkscape-devel] is 48.5 changing?
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 19:11:25 +0200 Shlomi Fish <shlomif@...2985...> wrote:
Hi John,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:44:50 -0500 john Culleton <John@...1202...> wrote:
If I refer to inkscape 48.5 in a book about cover design, am I OK with using the current version of 48.5 or are there still changes being made?
I update 0.91 nightly but not 48.5 However in the world of Scribus I update both 1.4.x and 1.5.0 nightly because changes are still being made in the "stable" product.
First of all - it's not "48.5" - it's "0.48.5" (with a leading zero). And otherwise, 0.48.5 is the version of a specific release - if there's going to be a new one in the 0.48.x maintenance branch, it will be "0.48.6".
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
P.S: your E-mail address's name part reads "john Culleton" with a lowercase "j", while you have a capital "J" in the username and in the signature. Is that on purpose?
Hmm. I'll search in my mail browser for that mistake. My email adresses proper all are in lower case only: john@...1202..., sales@...1202... etc. use all lower case letters. They are easier to remember that way.
Sorry about the dropped 0 in 0.48.5. "Quandoque bonus dormitat Homerus" or words to that effect.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:00:21 +0200 Shlomi Fish <shlomif@...2985...> wrote:
Next time, please reply to all recipients.
Content not of general interest IMO.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:17:38 -0500 John Culleton <John@...1202...> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:00:21 +0200 Shlomi Fish <shlomif@...2985...> wrote:
Next time, please reply to all recipients.
Content not of general interest IMO.
Dear John,
if you intend to reply in private, then the netiquette instructs that you should specifically say you've done so deliberately and mention the reason why. Otherwise, the recipient may assume the message was only sent in private by mistake. See:
http://www.shlomifish.org/meta/FAQ/#reply_to_list
Hope you better understand it now.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
participants (2)
-
John Culleton
-
Shlomi Fish