Hey guys,
I've tried to use the fill and vectorising tools in inkscape to create vectors from existing bitmaps; but I noticed an odd effect with the path that all requires two simplify node functions to get the path into a manageable state.
Are we currently taking into account the resolution of the raster image we are vectoring in order to smooth out the complexities of the pixelisation?
The maths need to be able to reduce the noise from the pixel shapes and try and increase the signal from the shape of the image section... although perhaps this is only useful for cartoon type images.
Thoughts?
Best Regards, Martin Owens
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Martin Owens <doctormo@...400...> wrote:
Are we currently taking into account the resolution of the raster image we are vectoring in order to smooth out the complexities of the pixelisation?
I don't think so, nor do I think we should.
For tracing, bitmaps don't have any intrinsic "resolution". What they have instead is the number of pixels across. If your image is a few tens of pixels across, its trace will be poor. The tracer just doesn't see in it some of the features you can easily see. If you have another bitmap where the same features are thousands of pixels across, its trace will be much better.
participants (2)
-
bulia byak -
Martin Owens