On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:36:09PM -0300, bulia byak wrote:

Kees,

I just ran ldd on the static 586 binary for 0.41 and 0.42. One difference is that 0.42 requires libgc:

libgc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 (0x40661000)

while 0.41 did not. Why is that? Can we please fix that? I suspect it's one of the reasons for why so many people have problems with running it now.

Yeah, I know. I've got fixes, but SF was dead this morning.

I'm not sure how that slipped in. I'm suspecting that the libgc detection changes broke the static build's ability to find the right version, and it linked against the dynamic instead. Grr.

I'm also about to head out the door to DefCon and OSCON, so this might be a good time for someone else to follow my wiki instructions...