Thanks Maren.

I also add another feat at the same way: "hide selected objects" "unhide objects below" I hope i commit the code in half hour or less.

Cheers, Jabier.

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 02:02 +0200, Maren Hachmann wrote:

Then for the strings I'd suggest:

• lock selected objects
• unlock objects below

Maren

Am 06.06.2017 um 01:51 schrieb Jabier Arraiza:

...

Great!!!

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 01:47 +0200, Maren Hachmann wrote:

...

That sounds very useful to me, Jabier!

Maren

Am 06.06.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Jabier Arraiza:

...

Yes.

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 00:34 +0200, Maren Hachmann wrote:

...

I still don't understand which items will be unlocked+selected - those directly below the cursor, no matter how deep in the stack of objects?

Maren

Am 05.06.2017 um 19:20 schrieb Jabier Arraiza:

...

Seems a complex UI to me. To my workflow and easyest to undertand seems better unlook all selecting them in the same step, deselect the one you dont want locked and lock with right click all the others. Its like a natural action easy to remember, more than hidden feats.

Cheers, Jabier.

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:40 +0100, C R wrote: > I see. Is it possible to just select all cursor locked > down > items, > and > then choose which ones to unlock? Or is that too much of > a > pain? > > -C > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Jabier Arraiza > <jabier.arraiz > a@...3326... > rker > .es> wrote: > > Cursor down locked items. > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:02 +0100, C R wrote: > > > Hey jabier. What are "down" items? > > > > > > Also, I just had an idea for unlocking: context > > > > Select > > > Locked, > > > which then > > > changes to context > Unlock Selected, which would let > > > users > > > deselect > > > items > > > they want to remain locked before unlocking. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > On 5 Jun 2017 4:56 p.m., "Jabier Arraiza" > > > <jabier.arraiza > > > @mar > > > ker. > > > es> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Realy the improvement is for unlock. Lock is by the > > > > way. > > > > > > > > Cheers, Jabier. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 15:33 +0000, Miguel Lopez > > > > wrote: > > > > > I'll vote yes to the optional feature to come to > > > > > Inkscape! I > > > > > tend > > > > > to > > > > > manipulate objects within objects dialog (I don't > > > > > use > > > > > Layers > > > > > dialog > > > > > anymore because objects dialog, and I always > > > > > convert > > > > > group to > > > > > layers > > > > > in the final) for locking, but it wouldn't hurt > > > > > to > > > > > have a > > > > > extra > > > > > way > > > > > to lock. > > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/2017 11:13 AM, Jabier Arraiza wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > > > A thing easy to do: > > > > > Right click->context_menu:lock selected items. > > > > > Right click->context_menu:unlock down items. > > > > > > > > > > First one is optional. > > > > > > > > > > Want to add to Inkscape? Please let try to say > > > > > the > > > > > best 1 > > > > > or > > > > > 2 > > > > > strings > > > > > to the menu. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Jabier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > > > > ---- > > > > > ---- > > > > > ---- > > > > > ---- > > > > > ---- > > > > > ----------- > > > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of > > > > > the > > > > > world's > > > > > most > > > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.lin > > > > > k/sl > > > > > ashd > > > > > ot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Inkscape-devel mailing list > > > > > Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:Inksc > > > > ape- > > > > > deve > > > > > l@...1721... > > > > > sts. > > > > > sour > > > > > ceforge.net> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inks > > > > > cape > > > > > -dev > > > > > el > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > ---- > > > > ---- > > > > --- > > > > ------------------ > > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the > > > > world's > > > > most > > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/ > > > > slas > > > > hdot > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Inkscape-devel mailing list > > > > Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inksca > > > > pe-d > > > > evel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > ---- > > > > ---- > > > > --------------------- > > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the > > > > world's > > > > most > > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/ > > > > slas > > > > hdot > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Inkscape-devel mailing list > > > > Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inksca > > > > pe-d > > > > evel

---

---

---

---

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel