Re: [Inkscape-devel] Re: confusion on the mandriva bug
But you compiled Inkscape itself with apbuild, right? That should be good enough when using static libraries.
At any rate, the dependencies look OK. I'd suggest people test this new package and let's see if we do any better.
Original Message: ----------------- From: aaron@...749... Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:20:30 -0500 To: mike@...869..., inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Inkscape-devel] Re: confusion on the mandriva bug
mike@...869... wrote:
Base system stuff, available nearly anywhere. The wild card is libC of course but that's what apbuild is for. If you compiled things statically using apbuild it should be fine.
Maybe I do have a problem then. The only libs I compiled were libgc, libglibmm and libgtkmm. Of those only libgc was compiled with apbuild.
Aaron Spike
-------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
mike@...869... wrote:
But you compiled Inkscape itself with apbuild, right? That should be good enough when using static libraries.
Yes, of course.
At any rate, the dependencies look OK. I'd suggest people test this new package and let's see if we do any better.
The package can be found here: http://www.inkscape.modevia.com/ap/inkscape-0.42.x86.package
Thanks to every one for the help and training.
Aaron Spike
participants (2)
-
unknown@example.com
-
mike@...869...