[Fwd: Re: [office] [Fwd: clarification: OpenDocument and SVG]]
Check it out! Progress on getting on w3.org's svg pages...
Jon
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [office] [Fwd: clarification: OpenDocument and SVG] Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:39:35 -0800 From: Chris Lilley <chris@...157...> Reply-To: Chris Lilley <chris@...157...> Organization: W3C To: Jon Phillips <jon@...235...> References: <4200ABF1.3010700@...677...> <4200C4A8.1030306@...678...> <4207e7a9.832074890@...689...> <1107368323.42011983e384f@...660...> <420139A2.3010603@...235...> <4201F976.8060306@...678...> <6610279990.20050203052414@...157...> <42033698.2050504@...235...>
On Friday, February 4, 2005, 12:47:20 AM, Jon wrote:
JP> Chris Lilley wrote:
On Thursday, February 3, 2005, 2:14:14 AM, Michael wrote:
MB> I believe that we will be able to resolve this issue in a way that is MB> beneficial to both the OpenDocument and SVG specs and agree that we MB> should keep the communication channels open. Who in the SVG group could MB> be the primary contact for the OpenDocument TC? Is it you?
Jon Phillips is not a member of the SVG WG. I am the chair of that WG, so the contact can be through me. The issue is going to be discussed at todays telcon (in 40 minutes time ...) but its possible that we will need more time, and more communication between the two groups, to resolve this successfully. I gather there is a hard deadline of this Friday for comments?
MB> I'd also like to thank Mental for bringing this topic to the attention MB> of our two working groups.
Yes, a very timely alert - thanks!
JP> Chris, could Inkscape (www.inkscape.org) and Open Clip Art Library JP> (www.openclipart.org) please get mentioned on the SVG portion of the W3C site. JP> We have been begging you guys for this off and on for a while. Please can we get JP> on some of your guys' pages as an SVG-based tool and a repository for SVG, JP> respectively.
The implementation database is supposed to be run by an external SVG organization, as of a year ago. However, they do not seem to have done anything yet. This is irritating for implementors (and for myself, as people keep asking me to add stuff and i can't).
I am meeting with those guys in 10 days time and will asked them about progress on this. if they haven't done it by then, i will get the database hosted somewhere else (like svg.org) which is where we syndicate our SVG news from.
The idea (was) that implementors could update their own entries as they released new versions, so it would always be up to date but viewable from a central location.
Cool, good work taking the opportunity to follow up on this Jon. :-)
Bryce
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Jon Phillips wrote:
Check it out! Progress on getting on w3.org's svg pages...
Jon
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [office] [Fwd: clarification: OpenDocument and SVG] Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:39:35 -0800 From: Chris Lilley <chris@...157...> Reply-To: Chris Lilley <chris@...157...> Organization: W3C To: Jon Phillips <jon@...235...> References: <4200ABF1.3010700@...677...> <4200C4A8.1030306@...678...> <4207e7a9.832074890@...689...> <1107368323.42011983e384f@...660...> <420139A2.3010603@...235...> <4201F976.8060306@...678...> <6610279990.20050203052414@...157...> <42033698.2050504@...235...>
On Friday, February 4, 2005, 12:47:20 AM, Jon wrote:
JP> Chris Lilley wrote:
On Thursday, February 3, 2005, 2:14:14 AM, Michael wrote:
MB> I believe that we will be able to resolve this issue in a way that is MB> beneficial to both the OpenDocument and SVG specs and agree that we MB> should keep the communication channels open. Who in the SVG group could MB> be the primary contact for the OpenDocument TC? Is it you?
Jon Phillips is not a member of the SVG WG. I am the chair of that WG, so the contact can be through me. The issue is going to be discussed at todays telcon (in 40 minutes time ...) but its possible that we will need more time, and more communication between the two groups, to resolve this successfully. I gather there is a hard deadline of this Friday for comments?
MB> I'd also like to thank Mental for bringing this topic to the attention MB> of our two working groups.
Yes, a very timely alert - thanks!
JP> Chris, could Inkscape (www.inkscape.org) and Open Clip Art Library JP> (www.openclipart.org) please get mentioned on the SVG portion of the W3C site. JP> We have been begging you guys for this off and on for a while. Please can we get JP> on some of your guys' pages as an SVG-based tool and a repository for SVG, JP> respectively.
The implementation database is supposed to be run by an external SVG organization, as of a year ago. However, they do not seem to have done anything yet. This is irritating for implementors (and for myself, as people keep asking me to add stuff and i can't).
I am meeting with those guys in 10 days time and will asked them about progress on this. if they haven't done it by then, i will get the database hosted somewhere else (like svg.org) which is where we syndicate our SVG news from.
The idea (was) that implementors could update their own entries as they released new versions, so it would always be up to date but viewable from a central location.
participants (2)
-
Bryce Harrington -
Jon Phillips