inkscape:connector-avoid vs inkscape:avoid
Some places in inkscape use inkscape:connector-avoid (attributes-test.cpp, and the spelling of SP_ATTR_CONNECTOR_AVOID), and some places use inkscape:avoid (sp_object_read_attr and sp_object_setAttribute).
I think I prefer inkscape:connector-avoid.
Or is it intended for the same attribute to be used for removing node-node overlaps? (Whether as a once-off operation, e.g. using Tim Dwyer's implementation, or the dynamic linear approximation stuff that njh & I did for UIST last year.) If so, then I'd go for inkscape:avoid, and change the enum to SP_ATTR_INKSCAPE_AVOID.
pjrm.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Peter Moulder wrote:
Some places in inkscape use inkscape:connector-avoid (attributes-test.cpp, and the spelling of SP_ATTR_CONNECTOR_AVOID), and some places use inkscape:avoid (sp_object_read_attr and sp_object_setAttribute).
I think I prefer inkscape:connector-avoid.
Or is it intended for the same attribute to be used for removing node-node overlaps? (Whether as a once-off operation, e.g. using Tim Dwyer's implementation, or the dynamic linear approximation stuff that njh & I did for UIST last year.) If so, then I'd go for inkscape:avoid, and change the enum to SP_ATTR_INKSCAPE_AVOID.
There were supposed to be the same thing. I agree that inkscape:connector-avoid is better. I will correct it shortly.
Michael
participants (2)
-
Michael Wybrow -
Peter Moulder