Hello,
The W3C SVG working group is in the final stages of getting the SVG 1.1 "Second Edition" out the door. The test suit has been greatly expanded as part of this work. Before the standard can be finalized, each test in the suite must have at least two SVG renderers pass the test. I have run Inkscape via the command line over the suite. At the moment there are 440 approved tests (this may change in the next few weeks). The results are:
OK (PASS): 166 PARTIAL: 23 FAIL: 251
Most of the fails are due to non-supported features:
No DOM, animation, interactivity support: ~160 No SVG font support: ~20
Still, there is quite a bit of room for improvement, some probably trivial.
I've prepared web pages for the tests. They can be found at:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/W3C_SVG_1.1F2/harness/htmlInkscapeApproved/...
Tav
I'm curious to know what you did with filter tests that fail because of no support for the color-interpolation properties? Because a lot of those are correct, except that the colors are wrong because we apply the filter in the wrong color space. So on the one hand marking them as FAIL might give the wrong impression (as the tests are not all meant to test support for color-interpolation-filters) and on the other hand marking them as PASS could hide the fact that we don't support the color-interpolation properties (as I don't think there is an explicit test for it).
If other renderers do support the color-interpolation properties (or make the same mistake as we do), it might be good to modify the filter tests to have color-interpolation-filters="sRGB" and make an explicit test for support of the color-interpolation properties. That might make for better separated tests.
On 2010-12-11 11:45, Tavmjong Bah wrote:
Hello,
The W3C SVG working group is in the final stages of getting the SVG 1.1 "Second Edition" out the door. The test suit has been greatly expanded as part of this work. Before the standard can be finalized, each test in the suite must have at least two SVG renderers pass the test. I have run Inkscape via the command line over the suite. At the moment there are 440 approved tests (this may change in the next few weeks). The results are:
OK (PASS): 166 PARTIAL: 23 FAIL: 251
Most of the fails are due to non-supported features:
No DOM, animation, interactivity support: ~160 No SVG font support: ~20
Still, there is quite a bit of room for improvement, some probably trivial.
I've prepared web pages for the tests. They can be found at:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/W3C_SVG_1.1F2/harness/htmlInkscapeApproved/...
Tav
Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 12:02 +0100, Jasper van de Gronde wrote:
I'm curious to know what you did with filter tests that fail because of no support for the color-interpolation properties? Because a lot of those are correct, except that the colors are wrong because we apply the filter in the wrong color space. So on the one hand marking them as FAIL might give the wrong impression (as the tests are not all meant to test support for color-interpolation-filters) and on the other hand marking them as PASS could hide the fact that we don't support the color-interpolation properties (as I don't think there is an explicit test for it).
Tests that failed due to color-space issues were marked as "PARTIAL"
If other renderers do support the color-interpolation properties (or make the same mistake as we do), it might be good to modify the filter tests to have color-interpolation-filters="sRGB" and make an explicit test for support of the color-interpolation properties. That might make for better separated tests.
Perhaps but there would be resistance to changing the tests at this late stage.
On 2010-12-11 11:45, Tavmjong Bah wrote:
Hello,
The W3C SVG working group is in the final stages of getting the SVG 1.1 "Second Edition" out the door. The test suit has been greatly expanded as part of this work. Before the standard can be finalized, each test in the suite must have at least two SVG renderers pass the test. I have run Inkscape via the command line over the suite. At the moment there are 440 approved tests (this may change in the next few weeks). The results are:
OK (PASS): 166 PARTIAL: 23 FAIL: 251
Most of the fails are due to non-supported features:
No DOM, animation, interactivity support: ~160 No SVG font support: ~20
Still, there is quite a bit of room for improvement, some probably trivial.
I've prepared web pages for the tests. They can be found at:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/W3C_SVG_1.1F2/harness/htmlInkscapeApproved/...
Tav
participants (2)
-
Jasper van de Gronde -
Tavmjong Bah