when putting some documents together you might end up with more than just one def-section and for some reason I had linked defs in front of the definitions, they were linked to. This seems to cause some weird behavior where you can't change the gradient with choosing a different one once, but you have to do so twice.
Also: Gradients are mor object orientated now, which I really like. going with this, each time I switch to gradient from a solid color, a new gradient is created. This gradient should automatically deleted right away, if I don't do anything exept for switching to a existing gradient. Otherwise I'm kinde forced to do clean up defs and in the worst case I have to create extra objects for the gradients, I want to keep. I hope you understand what I'm saying... seems kinda confusing to me
David
when putting some documents together you might end up with more than just one def-section
I don't think we support this at all, unfortunately. Lots of code assumes a single defs at the moment.
Gradients are mor object orientated now, which I really like. going with this, each time I switch to gradient from a solid color, a new gradient is created. This gradient should automatically deleted right away, if I don't do anything exept for switching to a existing gradient. Otherwise I'm kinde forced to do clean up defs and in the worst case I have to create extra objects for the gradients, I want to keep. I hope you understand what I'm saying... seems kinda confusing to me
Yes I know. I tried to make these gradients autocollected, but this crashed the fill&stroke when a gradient is deleted from under it (the deleted one remains in the list and that causes problems, i.e. the list must watch for changes in the gradients and update).
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 18:35, David Christian Berg wrote:
when putting some documents together you might end up with more than just one def-section and for some reason I had linked defs in front of the definitions, they were linked to. This seems to cause some weird behavior where you can't change the gradient with choosing a different one once, but you have to do so twice.
Correct, we need to rework the code to deal with multiple <defs> sections more gracefully.
-mental
participants (3)
-
bulia byak
-
David Christian Berg
-
MenTaLguY