11:19 a.m.
IBM donated a quad-proc PPC for Inkscape testing. I've finally overcome
the weird console problems it was having, and got Ubuntu Dapper
installed on it. Bryce and I are going to get Crucible running on it
shortly, but until then (and after), anyone who's interested in getting
an account on it, please email me your SSH pub key and desired account
name.
Doing "make -j6" it took about 3min40sec to do a full recompile. :)
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net
2:16 p.m.
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 19:19 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
IBM donated a quad-proc PPC for Inkscape testing. I've finally
overcome
the weird console problems it was having, and got Ubuntu Dapper
installed on it. Bryce and I are going to get Crucible running on it
shortly, but until then (and after), anyone who's interested in getting
an account on it, please email me your SSH pub key and desired account
name.
Cool. What's working? Can QEMU do reasonable x86 builds also? I'm
guessing this is a G5 (64-bit)?
--Ted
2:30 p.m.
On Sep 24, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
Cool. What's working? Can QEMU do reasonable x86 builds also?
I'm
guessing this is a G5 (64-bit)?
I'd not want to use QEMU for builds. On my dual G5 it was like using
a slow Win95 box.
However, mingw works well natively on PPC OS X to cross-compile
Windows binaries.
2:51 p.m.
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 22:30 -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
On Sep 24, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
> Cool. What's working? Can QEMU do reasonable x86 builds also? I'm
> guessing this is a G5 (64-bit)?
I'd not want to use QEMU for builds. On my dual G5 it was like using
a slow Win95 box.
However, mingw works well natively on PPC OS X to cross-compile
Windows binaries.
Sorry, I wasn't thinking as much for builds. Generally a cross compiler
works better. But, running the test suite will require some sort of
processor emulation. It'd be nice if we could run the tests on various
architectures (different bugs).
--Ted
3:41 p.m.
On Sep 24, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't thinking as much for builds. Generally a cross
compiler
works better. But, running the test suite will require some sort of
processor emulation. It'd be nice if we could run the tests on
various
architectures (different bugs).
Yes. Q (a wrapping of QEMU) is what I use to debug Win95 on an OS X box.
1:45 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:16:07PM -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
Cool. What's working? Can QEMU do reasonable x86 builds also?
I'm
guessing this is a G5 (64-bit)?
Yeah, 64bit quad G5. It's running Ubuntu Edgy now. I use it for
testing PPC builds of random Ubuntu stuff now.
Once Bryce has a spare weekend, we'll get Crucible running on it.
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net
4:43 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:45:01PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:16:07PM -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
> Cool. What's working? Can QEMU do reasonable x86 builds also? I'm
> guessing this is a G5 (64-bit)?
Yeah, 64bit quad G5. It's running Ubuntu Edgy now. I use it for
testing PPC builds of random Ubuntu stuff now.
Once Bryce has a spare weekend, we'll get Crucible running on it.
Speaking of which... set me up an account. :-)
I'll try to set aside some time this weekend to setting it up. Have you
had a chance to upgrade Sherborne?
Thanks,
Bryce
6087
days inactive
6100
days old
inkscape-devel@lists.inkscape.org
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bryce Harrington -
Jon A. Cruz -
Kees Cook -
Ted Gould