On Saturday 05 March 2005 20:25, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:13:09 +0100, Craig Bradney
<cbradney@...242...>
wrote:
> On Saturday 05 March 2005 15:05, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:25:19 +0000 (GMT), Alan Horkan
> >
> > <horkana@...44...> wrote:
> > > I've been looking at tackling this from the other direction and
> > > getting more of these stock graphics pushed into GTK for all kinds of
> > > GTK applications to use.
> >
> > Would you like to port Scribus to Gtk first? :)
>
> hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Well, it's not that funny really. If we want apps share look'n'feel,
then we've got to remember about inter[gtk-qt] portability. It's not
1999 after all :)
Alexandre
Its funny, because we will never port Scribus to gtk, as we have stated many
times over. Get over it.
As has been recently discussed in various places re look and feel, its
important to realise theres more at stake than just Gimp/Inkscape/Scribus
compatibility or look and feel.
Theres plenty of KDE users who want Scribus to be OK/Cancel, theres GTK people
who want Cancel/Ok, theres Mac people who want (and almost have) a Scribus
native port and Mac icons, theres Windows people who want a port with Windows
look and feel.
In the KDE case, apart from a potential migration to having Gnome and KDE
share icon sets, they want their icons, Gnome people want their icons. Then
theres all the non Gnome/KDE people who want their icons. Then add on top the
dialog design, which is not common across platforms.
Making a simple statement about getting these three apps to look like each
other, while certainly important, doesnt necessarily bring compatibility in
all directions.
Craig