Hey All,
Who would be interested in a good old fashioned IRC meeting to discuss various things about the project? It seems like other projects seem to be able to pull them together (on a regular basis no less), so why not us? I would especially like if we could get the likes of Krzysztof, Johan, Tavmjong, Jasper, Jon, Alex, Kris, and anyone else who would be interested. This especially goes for anyone who lurks on the devel list who is interested in contributing but still hasn't introduced themselves yet (they're always around). ;)
I think it would be good to get people together to help us help each other. I think one of the things we should remember is that sometimes reviewing others work or just answering questions, can be more valuable than actually writing code yourself. I'm not asking for a huge time commitment or anything. If you are interested please chime in with any preferred dates or times so we can coordinate based on global distribution of participants. I'll throw out the 18th as a possible date... mainly because it's not terribly likely that this will happen and the 18th is my birthday so that's my wish. :P
Cheers, Josh
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Josh Andler wrote:
Hey All,
Who would be interested in a good old fashioned IRC meeting to discuss various things about the project? It seems like other projects seem to be able to pull them together (on a regular basis no less), so why not us? I would especially like if we could get the likes of Krzysztof, Johan, Tavmjong, Jasper, Jon, Alex, Kris, and anyone else who would be interested. This especially goes for anyone who lurks on the devel list who is interested in contributing but still hasn't introduced themselves yet (they're always around). ;)
I think it would be good to get people together to help us help each other. I think one of the things we should remember is that sometimes reviewing others work or just answering questions, can be more valuable than actually writing code yourself. I'm not asking for a huge time commitment or anything. If you are interested please chime in with any preferred dates or times so we can coordinate based on global distribution of participants. I'll throw out the 18th as a possible date... mainly because it's not terribly likely that this will happen and the 18th is my birthday so that's my wish. :P
So if the weddi...um, dev meeting doesn't work out, at least we have a party? :)
Personally I'm more concerned about timezones.
Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine < alexandre.prokoudine@...400...> wrote:
So if the weddi...um, dev meeting doesn't work out, at least we have a party? :)
:)
Personally I'm more concerned about timezones.
It probably doesn't help much, but I can make myself available pretty much any time if given notice.
Cheers, Josh
I'm in, as long as it's after December 10th (crystallography exam). Here's the timetable after that date: Mon - after 17:00 UTC Tue - any time Wed - any time Thu - after 13:00 UTC Fri - after 16:00 UTC Sat - any time Sun - any time
Regards, Krzysztof
By the way, if more people want to join, we can use doodle.com to arrive at a suitable date.
Regards, Krzysztof
would like to join time zone is GMT+5.30 anyday 1200 UTC to 1600 UTC weekends 0200 UTC to 1600 UTC
looking forward to join and introduce myself, thanks
2011/12/7 Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk.pl@...400...>
By the way, if more people want to join, we can use doodle.com to arrive at a suitable date.
Regards, Krzysztof
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
Of course I am interested (and worried about chat chaos...). 18th is weekend = good for me. I think it will be in the evening for Europe and morning for USA?
Cheers, Johan
On 6-12-2011 23:16, Josh Andler wrote:
Hey All,
Who would be interested in a good old fashioned IRC meeting to discuss various things about the project? It seems like other projects seem to be able to pull them together (on a regular basis no less), so why not us? I would especially like if we could get the likes of Krzysztof, Johan, Tavmjong, Jasper, Jon, Alex, Kris, and anyone else who would be interested. This especially goes for anyone who lurks on the devel list who is interested in contributing but still hasn't introduced themselves yet (they're always around). ;)
I think it would be good to get people together to help us help each other. I think one of the things we should remember is that sometimes reviewing others work or just answering questions, can be more valuable than actually writing code yourself. I'm not asking for a huge time commitment or anything. If you are interested please chime in with any preferred dates or times so we can coordinate based on global distribution of participants. I'll throw out the 18th as a possible date... mainly because it's not terribly likely that this will happen and the 18th is my birthday so that's my wish. :P
Cheers, Josh
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
Yep, count me in. Any weekday 0900-1030 or 1700-0000 UTC is fine. Weekends could be OK too, but I can't guarantee it, unfortunately. 18th might be possible after say 2000 UTC.
Cheers,
AV
On 7 December 2011 22:26, Johan Engelen <jbc.engelen@...2592...> wrote:
Of course I am interested (and worried about chat chaos...). 18th is weekend = good for me. I think it will be in the evening for Europe and morning for USA?
Cheers, Johan
On 6-12-2011 23:16, Josh Andler wrote:
Hey All,
Who would be interested in a good old fashioned IRC meeting to discuss various things about the project? It seems like other projects seem to be able to pull them together (on a regular basis no less), so why not us? I would especially like if we could get the likes of Krzysztof, Johan, Tavmjong, Jasper, Jon, Alex, Kris, and anyone else who would be interested. This especially goes for anyone who lurks on the devel list who is interested in contributing but still hasn't introduced themselves yet (they're always around). ;)
I think it would be good to get people together to help us help each other. I think one of the things we should remember is that sometimes reviewing others work or just answering questions, can be more valuable than actually writing code yourself. I'm not asking for a huge time commitment or anything. If you are interested please chime in with any preferred dates or times so we can coordinate based on global distribution of participants. I'll throw out the 18th as a possible date... mainly because it's not terribly likely that this will happen and the 18th is my birthday so that's my wish. :P
Cheers, Josh
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
The 18th is not possible for me. No general guidelines though on when I'll be available for an IRC meeting.
BTW: today I made my first commit that is going deep into the source code. I just committed the refactoring of sp-attribute-widget.cpp from gtk to gtkmm (see my mail in "Next release check-in..."). Hoping all went fine. :-)
Kind regards K.
2011/12/8 Alex Valavanis <valavanisalex@...400...>:
Yep, count me in. Any weekday 0900-1030 or 1700-0000 UTC is fine. Weekends could be OK too, but I can't guarantee it, unfortunately. 18th might be possible after say 2000 UTC.
Cheers,
AV
On 16/12/11 22:15, Kris De Gussem wrote:
BTW: today I made my first commit that is going deep into the source code. I just committed the refactoring of sp-attribute-widget.cpp from gtk to gtkmm (see my mail in "Next release check-in..."). Hoping all went fine. :-)
Inkscape 0.48+devel r10775 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (i386), GCC 4.2.1
1) The properties dialog cannot be kept closed anymore: Once the object properties dialog has been opened and closed in the current session, it gets reopened together with any other dialog that is opened (be it a dockable one or another floating-only dialog), also in new document windows opened from within the same Inkscape instance (the dialog was been shared/reused by all document windows already before r10775).
2) Dockable vs undockable dialogs Would it be possible to convert the object properties dialog to a dockable dialog in the course of this C++ification? See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/592323
3) Compiler warning: header include On OS X 10.5.8 Leopard with Apple's GCC 4.2.1 (which uses the header files from the system default compiler GCC 4.0.1), I get a warning about "at least one deprecated or antiquated header" with regard to '#include <vector.h>' in 'src/widgets/widgets/sp-attribute-widget.h':
CXX dialogs/item-properties.o In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.0.0/backward/vector.h:59, from dialogs/../widgets/sp-attribute-widget.h:23, from dialogs/item-properties.cpp:35: /usr/include/c++/4.0.0/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the <X> header for the <X.h> header for C++ includes, or <iostream> instead of the deprecated header <iostream.h>. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
4) Compiler warning: signed vs unsigned (possibly due to the outdated GCC version on my legacy system?)
CXX widgets/sp-attribute-widget.o widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp: In member function ‘void SPAttributeTable::set_object(SPObject*, std::vector<Glib::ustring, std::allocatorGlib::ustring >&, std::vector<Glib::ustring, std::allocatorGlib::ustring >&, GtkWidget*)’: widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp:280: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp: In member function ‘void SPAttributeTable::set_repr(Inkscape::XML::Node*, std::vector<Glib::ustring, std::allocatorGlib::ustring >&, std::vector<Glib::ustring, std::allocatorGlib::ustring >&, GtkWidget*)’: widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp:338: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp: In function ‘void sp_attribute_table_object_modified(SPObject*, guint, SPAttributeTable*)’: widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp:384: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp: In function ‘void sp_attribute_table_entry_changed(Gtk::Editable*, SPAttributeTable*)’: widgets/sp-attribute-widget.cpp:411: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
Build Configuration:
Compiler: g++-4.2 CPPFLAGS: -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-security -W -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/Volumes/green/mp-inkscape/with-a-long-long-long-directory-name/include CXXFLAGS: -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 CFLAGS: -Wno-pointer-sign -O3 LDFLAGS: -L/Volumes/green/mp-inkscape/with-a-long-long-long-directory-name/lib
~suv
Now replying (and extending reply) to the list:
Compiler warnings should not pop up anymore.
2011/12/16 ~suv <suv-sf@...58...>:
On 16/12/11 22:15, Kris De Gussem wrote: Inkscape 0.48+devel r10775 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (i386), GCC 4.2.1
- The properties dialog cannot be kept closed anymore:
Once the object properties dialog has been opened and closed in the current session, it gets reopened together with any other dialog that is opened (be it a dockable one or another floating-only dialog), also in new document windows opened from within the same Inkscape instance (the dialog was been shared/reused by all document windows already before r10775).
dialogs/item-properties.cpp definitely needs some refactoring.
This weird behaviour with multiple minimized windows opening when you want to reopen only one minimized window seems to be present in 0.48.x. Is this correct?
Regards K.
On 17/12/11 12:45, Kris De Gussem wrote:
Now replying (and extending reply) to the list:
Compiler warnings should not pop up anymore.
2011/12/16 ~suv <suv-sf@...58...>:
On 16/12/11 22:15, Kris De Gussem wrote: Inkscape 0.48+devel r10775 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (i386), GCC 4.2.1
- The properties dialog cannot be kept closed anymore:
Once the object properties dialog has been opened and closed in the current session, it gets reopened together with any other dialog that is opened (be it a dockable one or another floating-only dialog), also in new document windows opened from within the same Inkscape instance (the dialog was been shared/reused by all document windows already before r10775).
dialogs/item-properties.cpp definitely needs some refactoring.
This weird behaviour with multiple minimized windows opening when you want to reopen only one minimized window seems to be present in 0.48.x. Is this correct?
Just to clarify: on Mac OS X my issue is _not_ with _minimizing_ the 'Object Properties' dialog: I actually close it using either ''Ctrl+W' or the close button provided by the window manager, and still it reopens as soon as I open any other dialog. I simply can't keep it closed anymore - whether working with a single document window or several of them. This did not happen before r10775 (and later).
~suv
Hi all,
I will be online today (18th) in the evening (GMT).
See you in the chatbox, Johan
On 6-12-2011 23:16, Josh Andler wrote:
Hey All,
Who would be interested in a good old fashioned IRC meeting to discuss various things about the project? It seems like other projects seem to be able to pull them together (on a regular basis no less), so why not us? I would especially like if we could get the likes of Krzysztof, Johan, Tavmjong, Jasper, Jon, Alex, Kris, and anyone else who would be interested. This especially goes for anyone who lurks on the devel list who is interested in contributing but still hasn't introduced themselves yet (they're always around). ;)
I think it would be good to get people together to help us help each other. I think one of the things we should remember is that sometimes reviewing others work or just answering questions, can be more valuable than actually writing code yourself. I'm not asking for a huge time commitment or anything. If you are interested please chime in with any preferred dates or times so we can coordinate based on global distribution of participants. I'll throw out the 18th as a possible date... mainly because it's not terribly likely that this will happen and the 18th is my birthday so that's my wish. :P
Cheers, Josh
Hi all
Refactoring of the object properties dialog is completed with revision 10815. The associated issues should have fixed now. Probably it is a good idea to make this dialog dockable. Anyone having a good code example showing how to do this?
I also plan to copy the behaviour of the object properties dialog to the image properties dialog (so: update on selection change, object modification, floating on top of the other windows, single shared instance).
Kind regards K.
Hey all,
Thread resurrection! I'm going the route Krzysztof threw out there and put this up on Doodle... If you have previously expressed an interest in participating (or I feel like adding you anyway), you will get an email regarding voting for the 60 available slots I put on there. :) Note, you will probably want to switch the time to your local time so you don't have to do the UTC math in your head.
Cheers, Josh
Hey all,
Gotta love that first time use thing. As I thought would be a better option (and it exists) there's no need to email everyone... if you want in, go to http://www.doodle.com/rkbenkupnqqm2u4a and put your name and when works for you. Let's make it happen!
Cheers, Josh
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Josh Andler <scislac@...400...> wrote:
Hey all,
Thread resurrection! I'm going the route Krzysztof threw out there and put this up on Doodle... If you have previously expressed an interest in participating (or I feel like adding you anyway), you will get an email regarding voting for the 60 available slots I put on there. :) Note, you will probably want to switch the time to your local time so you don't have to do the UTC math in your head.
Cheers, Josh
participants (8)
-
Alex Valavanis -
Alexandre Prokoudine -
Buddhika Chandradeepa Kurera -
Johan Engelen -
Josh Andler -
Kris De Gussem -
Krzysztof Kosiński -
~suv