I had mistakenly thought that my patch to remove the malloc.h includes ( replacing them with unistd.h ) had been applied. It hasn't, and I'd like to know if anyone else has trouble making without the includes to malloc. If this is not the case ( meaning no problems ) then can we get the cvs updated so I don't have to apply the patch myself every time I update :)
Thanks,
Thomas
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 11:41, T Ingham wrote:
I had mistakenly thought that my patch to remove the malloc.h includes ( replacing them with unistd.h ) had been applied. It hasn't, and I'd like to know if anyone else has trouble making without the includes to malloc. If this is not the case ( meaning no problems ) then can we get the cvs updated so I don't have to apply the patch myself every time I update :)
I think we should be okay; malloc() and company are available in <stdlib.h>.
-mental
So should I make the changes and commit them?
Also there is the src/Makefile.am change affecting --export-dynamic ( Wl, has to come out )
-thomas
On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:18 PM, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 11:41, T Ingham wrote:
I had mistakenly thought that my patch to remove the malloc.h includes ( replacing them with unistd.h ) had been applied. It hasn't, and I'd like to know if anyone else has trouble making without the includes to malloc. If this is not the case ( meaning no problems ) then can we get the cvs updated so I don't have to apply the patch myself every time I update :)
I think we should be okay; malloc() and company are available in <stdlib.h>.
-mental
Go for it. I meant to do it last night but didn't have time after finishing the tasks for the release.
Thanks, Bryce
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, T Ingham wrote:
So should I make the changes and commit them?
Also there is the src/Makefile.am change affecting --export-dynamic ( Wl, has to come out )
-thomas
On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:18 PM, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 11:41, T Ingham wrote:
I had mistakenly thought that my patch to remove the malloc.h includes ( replacing them with unistd.h ) had been applied. It hasn't, and I'd like to know if anyone else has trouble making without the includes to malloc. If this is not the case ( meaning no problems ) then can we get the cvs updated so I don't have to apply the patch myself every time I update :)
I think we should be okay; malloc() and company are available in <stdlib.h>.
-mental
participants (3)
-
Bryce Harrington -
MenTaLguY -
T Ingham