Re: [Inkscape-user] Inkscape is spectacular -- feature requests?
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:11:52 +1000, Trent Buck <fubarbaz@...405...> wrote:
<g transform="..."> <image source="....svg" /> </g>
Perfectly possible, except that you lose vector editability and resolution-independence of the linked images.
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 23:39, bulia byak wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:11:52 +1000, Trent Buck <fubarbaz@...405...> wrote:
<g transform="..."> <image source="....svg" /> </g>Perfectly possible, except that you lose vector editability and resolution-independence of the linked images.
Huh? Embedded SVG images, per the spec, remain resolution-independent (i.e. they're rendered as vectors as part of the including document, not pre-rasterized).
Editability would be strictly an issue of Inkscape -- we could certainly do it, though there would be some issues to think through carefully.
-mental
<g transform="..."> <image source="....svg" /> </g>Huh? Embedded SVG images, per the spec, remain resolution-independent (i.e. they're rendered as vectors as part of the including document, not pre-rasterized).
Ah, sure. I just didn't notice that it was not bitmaps that were embedded. I think we only support <image> for bitmaps; never tried it for embedding SVGs.
participants (2)
-
bulia byak -
MenTaLguY