Hi,
The word "refactoring" is floating in the air ever since 0.46 was branched. What I'm curious about is whether we have the exact plan of what we want to do.
This is especially interesting in the context of other words like "animation". Is it still planned to split Inkscape into InkCore to make it possible building new applications? Do we want animation as part of Inkscape or as a co-project?
Alexandre
-----Original Message----- From: inkscape-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:inkscape-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Alexandre Prokoudine Sent: maandag 3 maart 2008 10:07 To: inkscape List Subject: [Inkscape-devel] on refactoring
Hi,
The word "refactoring" is floating in the air ever since 0.46 was branched. What I'm curious about is whether we have the exact plan of what we want to do.
This is especially interesting in the context of other words like "animation". Is it still planned to split Inkscape into InkCore to make it possible building new applications? Do we want animation as part of Inkscape or as a co-project?
Maybe http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Roadmap is of help?
Perhaps I will be doing 2geom integration for GSoC...
-johan
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:59:02AM +0100, J.B.C.Engelen@...1578... wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: inkscape-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:inkscape-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Alexandre Prokoudine Sent: maandag 3 maart 2008 10:07 To: inkscape List Subject: [Inkscape-devel] on refactoring
Hi,
The word "refactoring" is floating in the air ever since 0.46 was branched. What I'm curious about is whether we have the exact plan of what we want to do.
I'll put out a plan of attack once 0.46.0 is tagged. I've been gathering notes on what needs done in talking with several people the past few months, but want to focus on getting 0.46 out the door first.
Bryce
participants (3)
-
unknown＠example.com -
Alexandre Prokoudine -
Bryce Harrington