Some gradient fills in the icons.svg file broken?
Hi,
I've just noticed in CVS that the most of the toolbar icons for the XML editor toolbar show up black. Opening the icons.svg file shows them to be black too. Opening the same icons.svg file in 0.42.2 shows the icons fine. This is because the gradient fill for these icons isn't working and is just showing up black. FWIW, it seems that the two versions load some of the XML in a slightly different order.
Cheers, Michael
On 8/22/05, Michael Wybrow <mjwybrow@...839...> wrote:
I've just noticed in CVS that the most of the toolbar icons for the XML editor toolbar show up black. Opening the icons.svg file shows them to be black too. Opening the same icons.svg file in 0.42.2 shows the icons fine. This is because the gradient fill for these icons isn't working and is just showing up black. FWIW, it seems that the two versions load some of the XML in a slightly different order.
Yes. Can anyone guess which of the recent changes could cause this? If not we'll need to do a binary search for the breakage commit.
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, bulia byak wrote:
On 8/22/05, Michael Wybrow <mjwybrow@...839...> wrote:
I've just noticed in CVS that the most of the toolbar icons for the XML editor toolbar show up black. Opening the icons.svg file shows them to be black too. Opening the same icons.svg file in 0.42.2 shows the icons fine. This is because the gradient fill for these icons isn't working and is just showing up black. FWIW, it seems that the two versions load some of the XML in a slightly different order.
Yes. Can anyone guess which of the recent changes could cause this? If not we'll need to do a binary search for the breakage commit.
My naive guess: Wasn't there some work done on reordering the SVG when it was read in or written on save? If so, could the order of definitions effect whether gradients work correctly?
Michael
On 8/22/05, Michael Wybrow <mjwybrow@...839...> wrote:
My naive guess: Wasn't there some work done on reordering the SVG when it was read in or written on save? If so, could the order of definitions effect whether gradients work correctly?
I only know of Mental's fixing the reverse order of attributes on save, but it was done before 0.42, and order of attributes would not affect this anyway.
I found the reason for this bug. It's now submitted to the tracker and assigned to Peter Moulder:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1266843&gro...
On 8/22/05, Michael Wybrow <mjwybrow@...839...> wrote:
Hi,
I've just noticed in CVS that the most of the toolbar icons for the XML editor toolbar show up black. Opening the icons.svg file shows them to be black too. Opening the same icons.svg file in 0.42.2 shows the icons fine. This is because the gradient fill for these icons isn't working and is just showing up black. FWIW, it seems that the two versions load some of the XML in a slightly different order.
Cheers, Michael
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
participants (2)
-
bulia byak -
Michael Wybrow