It seems that we require automake 1.7 or newer now. (1.6 fails to build.) Shall I attempt to upgrade the min requirements?
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
It seems that we require automake 1.7 or newer now. (1.6 fails to build.) Shall I attempt to upgrade the min requirements?
Ignore me. I seem to be having some sort of build problem, and it's not automake's fault. I will report back once I figure out why I'm seeing this:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/kees/cvs/remote/inkscape/src/libarikkei' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `arikkei-dict.c', needed by `arikkei-dict.o'. Stop.
When there are no .c suffixes in any of the Makefiles...
Weird.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
It seems that we require automake 1.7 or newer now. (1.6 fails to build.) Shall I attempt to upgrade the min requirements?
Ignore me. I seem to be having some sort of build problem, and it's not automake's fault. I will report back once I figure out why I'm seeing this:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/kees/cvs/remote/inkscape/src/libarikkei' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `arikkei-dict.c', needed by `arikkei-dict.o'. Stop.
When there are no .c suffixes in any of the Makefiles...
Note that for make, .c is a default suffix, so this error can show up when you don't have the .cpp.o rule defined.
Bryce
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:47:43PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
When there are no .c suffixes in any of the Makefiles...
Note that for make, .c is a default suffix, so this error can show up when you don't have the .cpp.o rule defined.
Yeah, it was a weird one. Basically, the left-over dep files made it look like the .cpp file needed rebuilding (according to "make -d"). Heh.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:42:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/kees/cvs/remote/inkscape/src/libarikkei' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `arikkei-dict.c', needed by `arikkei-dict.o'. Stop.
Answer: always run "make distclean" if you haven't build a tree in a long time.
Nevermind...
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:43:17PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
Please do, good catch.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Kees Cook wrote:
It seems that we require automake 1.7 or newer now. (1.6 fails to build.) Shall I attempt to upgrade the min requirements?
I think I won't do this yet. While it seems 1.7 adds a few files, I think 1.6 still "does the job".
participants (2)
-
Bryce Harrington -
Kees Cook