Thanks Tav, Inkscape's most powerful asset is it's authority over it's brand. If a space where the community gathers is blessed as official and linked well like I stated in my previous question, then it has more power to improve Inkscape's whole community. A good candidate is the inkscape forum. A good example of what I mean would be Kickstarter or Patreon; Inkscape should involve itself more directly with creating and managing funding campaigns. These would both grow community and create a new kind of space where users can contribute (one not yet fully utilized). These kinds of spaces must be managed by the inkscape board more directly as only inkscape itself can lend the authenticity to users seeking to contribute in this way. Best Regards, Martin Owens

2015-08-20 16:46 GMT+02:00 Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@...8...>: Our biggest assets are our brand, our existing community of users, and the adoption of SVG on the Web. Probably the most important and high profile case of such adoption is Wikimedia Commons. To make users more involved with the project, I think the obvious thing to do is reducing the barrier to entry for contributing. There are many people in the community who don't know how to program, but are excellent artists. A moderated repository of creative resources (e.g. sets of symbols for the Symbol dialog, extensions, filter presets, alternative icons, and so on) accessible through our website would provide a simple entry point for new contributors. There should be a way to browse and install these resources directly from Inkscape. This is rather important - if we provide a way to conveniently share resources via our website, many people might decide that licensing their artwork under a permissive license is a reasonable price to pay to be able to use them on every machine. Moderators of this repository could be recruited from the community, so it would not require us to spread our somewhat limited developer manpower even thinner. We could introduce 'installers' for creative resources and extensions. The current process of installing them is not very user friendly. It should not be more difficult than double-clicking on a package. Unfortunately, it would require someone to spend some development cycles on Windows and OSX to make sure that these installers work cross-platform. community is creating more extension points. The simple filter model we have for extensions is very useful, but at the same time rather limited. Some examples of new extension points would be: * Complex filters with adjustable parameters. Right now one can create a filter and set some parameters, but adjusting them afterwards requires knowledge of the internals of the filter. * Templates, especially procedurally generated ones. We already have a 'new from template' dialog that supports those. * Live effects as extensions in a scripting language, such as Python. This would require cleaning up the live effect API and bringing the Python binding of 2Geom up to speed. * Scripts. This requires the most initial work, but the payoff is probably the biggest, and the feature is very useful even for people who won't contribute anything to Inkscape. Another issue I mentioned on the hackfest is domain-specific drawing editors. I would classify this as a very long term goal. There is a lot of demand for a vector drawing program that can be extended to cover the needs of a specific community. For example, Inkscape could be extended into a chemical structures editor or an UML editor. This could be done either by better modularization, with those domain-specific editors being standalone applications that link to libinksomething.so, or by making Inkscape extensions sufficiently powerful to allow such things. I have some experience with organizing large events; In 2012 I managed a conference for chemical students with over 100 attendees. These skills could be helpful when organizing hackfests or similar community events. I think the board could provide technical direction to Inkscape and relieve some of our accumulated technical debt by funding specific development tasks from general funds obtained from Patreon. AFAIU, Patreon allows people to make a small recurring donation to an organization or artist they like, but it's not tied to a specific project. Kickstarter-style, project-oriented crowdsourcing could work well for adding new exciting features, but we'll have to rely on something else for maintenance stuff. I'm fairly good at code analysis and design, and could handle the technical side of such an effort - define goals for those maintenance projects, and if time permits also implement some of them. The long term funding goal should be to secure enough recurring contributions to hire one or more full time developers, or at least accumulate enough funds to hire a contractor for a longer period of time. Regards, Krzysztof