Failed 17 of 176 tests on cxxtests
May be good to clean the errors in inkscape cxxtests before realize the new version. Here you can see the make test result: http://wiki.softwarelivre.org/InkscapeBrasil/LastMakeCheck
Aurium
Thanks for pointing it out to us Aurium. I fixed 3 errors. Some errors are not too bad I think (e.g. the ones about reading matrices where it should actually fail to read them)
ciao, Johan
-----Original Message----- From: Aurélio A. Heckert [mailto:aurium@...400...] Sent: maandag 28 september 2009 18:52 To: inkscape-devel Subject: [Inkscape-devel] Failed 17 of 176 tests on cxxtests
May be good to clean the errors in inkscape cxxtests before realize the new version. Here you can see the make test result: http://wiki.softwarelivre.org/InkscapeBrasil/LastMakeCheck
Aurium
-- Aurélio A. Heckert http://colivre.coop.br/Aurium GNU/Linux User #312507 http://counter.li.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ilustração Vetorial Livre: http://InkscapeBrasil.org Coop. de Tecnologias Livres: http://Colivre.coop.br - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "Eu temo pela minha espécie quando penso que Deus é justo." Thomas Jefferson
Antes de imprimir esta mensagem reflita sobre a sua responsabilidade com a preservação do Meio Ambiente.
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
J.B.C.Engelen@...1578... wrote:
Thanks for pointing it out to us Aurium. I fixed 3 errors. Some errors are not too bad I think (e.g. the ones about reading matrices where it should actually fail to read them)
If the latter occurs the test is wrong! A test should only fail if the behaviour is wrong, and it is customary (and good practice) to also test some cases that should normally result in some kind of failure condition (thus resulting in a pass result in your test).
-----Original Message----- From: Jasper van de Gronde [mailto:th.v.d.gronde@...528...] Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 14:03 To: Engelen, J.B.C. (Johan) Cc: inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Inkscape-devel] Failed 17 of 176 tests on cxxtests
J.B.C.Engelen@...1578... wrote:
Thanks for pointing it out to us Aurium. I fixed 3 errors. Some errors are not too bad I think (e.g.
the ones
about reading matrices where it should actually fail to read them)
If the latter occurs the test is wrong! A test should only fail if the behaviour is wrong, and it is customary (and good practice) to also test some cases that should normally result in some kind of failure condition (thus resulting in a pass result in your test).
I think the tests are correct. The tests I was refering to test whether Inkscape accepts strange input. "matrix(1,2,3,4,5,6,)" (note the extra comma) is apparently invalid input, and Inkscape should not accept that. The test checks if Inkscape rejects it ("fails to read" it). But since Inkscape does accept it, the test fails. So I meant: "the ones where Inkscape reads matrices that are invalid input, where it should actually not read them"
Ciao, Johan
participants (3)
-
unknown＠example.com -
Aurélio A. Heckert -
Jasper van de Gronde