Well, the release notes have a description of what's working as well as submitting bugs: Basic one-to-one document editing functionality exists in this initial release. You can login to a Jabber server and initiate a connection with another user. You can then make changes to the document and they will be sent to the sharing user and any changes they make will be sent to you. There are many bugs and surely more that we don't know about. Please use the Bug Tracker on SourceForge ( http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=113865&atid=666480 ) to submit any new bugs.

We plan to have another release at the end of this week that addresses several bugs we already know about as well as adding some more functionality. For example, the v0.1 release doesn't attempt to send the initial document when creating a new share connection, but the version in CVS successfully sends an initial document.

The initial release can be downloaded at http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=113865.

The distcheck missing was in Linux(Fedora Core 3 to be specific).

Thanks, Steven

-----Original Message----- From: Ted Gould [mailto:ted@...11...] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 2:02 AM To: Montgomery, Steven S Cc: inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Inkscape-devel] Inkboard - RPM for first release

On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 01:44 -0500, Montgomery, Steven S wrote:

Release 0.1 source should be available for download on Sourceforge.

Awesome! Is there an announcement that tells us what functionality is working in this version? Where should bugs be submitted? Can you provide a link to the downloads?

I should note that we always have the error about intltool. Inkscape still seemed to work fine, so we didn't think much of it. But I guess rpm is a little more picky...

Oh, and when I try `make distcheck` as suggested, I get 'make: *** No rule to make target `distcheck'. Stop.'

Well, intltool is what manages the translations. So you probably wouldn't notice any errors that were caused by it if you only used Inkboard in English. Sounds like a macro problem, but that would be really weird, probably better to fix distcheck first.

Was distcheck missing on Linux or Windows? I'm not sure if it is supposed to exist in the Windows makefiles. It should be there for Linux.

--Ted