Le 02/08/2016 à 00:10, Martin Owens a écrit :
Copyleft - using copyright terms to REQUIRE that copies retain the same license no matter how it's modified or re-copied. GPL and Creative Commons Share-alike are copyleft. Apache, MIT and Creative Commons Attribution are not copyleft licences. Although all are open source and Free Software licenses.
Indeed it's more rigorous — :) —, even though I don't think there's much software that is licensed under Creative Commons terms. But it may be possible.
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Tutorials_and_help#English_.2 8en.29
The wiki is dedicated to inkscape development. So tutorials about inkscape development (coding, website devel, writing docs) makes sense. But tutorials about how inkscape can be used should go on the website itself.
You can use the wiki to plan out or draft content though, as long as the intention is that it'll end up on our public facing website at some point.
Okay; I hadn't understood it like that yet… The wiki has a very poor organization. You may have noticed that I started to work on it, at least on the home page. On this home page, section ‘Project Info’, there are still several page that are addressed to normal users (and redundent with the main website): About, Features, the FAQ (for questions not related to development)… I'd like to make things clearer but I'll need your help of course — :) — as I don't know much about the project and the way you see things.
My first thoughts: * Couldn't we remove ‘/wiki/index.php’ from the URL and get something like ‘http://wiki.inkscape.org/Inkscape%E2%80%99 that would be clear enough, more logical/KISS, easier to type and shorter when copied? * Do we still want to support the wiki translation (for release notes maybe)? Then could we use MediaWiki's new and official translation system (used on https://meta.wikimedia.org/ for example)? -- Sylvain