Brianna,
Great to finally meet you!
I think we need to make sure at least one license is GPL in keeping with the software itself. I don't think there's any problem with dual licensing - at least personally - or even triple, if need be. What does FLOSS Manuals require/recommend, Adam?
Although I'm not entirely familliar with GFDL (I'll read up on it), it should be fine.
More later.
JF
PS - I'm sending this to the list too, since I think it's an important discussion to have there.
Brianna Laugher wrote:
BTW, a question: what license is intended to be used for the material created during the book sprint?
Text at Wikimedia Commons, and almost all of the Wikimedia projects, is GFDL. If the booksprint content was licensed (or dual licensed) under this license, it would allow it to be easily incorporated and integrated into Commons help texts and such. If the content was solely licensed under GFDL, it would allow FLOSS Manuals to integrate back any useful text from Commons et al.
Just a thought.
cheers, Brianna