As far as I understand, when the current website started to be developed
(approx 5 years ago) the website was to be groomed towards users and the
wiki was going to be groomed to be development-facing.
So putting any articles benefitting users in the wiki would not be
appropriate.
This sounds like it might be a borderline case, where an article on how
to write themes and create icons sets would benefit both developers and
users. Perhaps such an article should be cross posted - both in the
wiki and in the gallery? (Although such an article would need to be
written in 2 different ways - one in developer-speak, and the other
which non-tech-savy users could understand....)
As far as the GitLab repo, while I have not heard anything about which
group it's meant to serve, to me, GL is primarily for developers as well.
It seems like I heard a whisper, maybe 3 or even 4 years ago, about
wanting to close the wiki. I don't remember what was supposed to
replace it, but GL had not been mentioned at that time. As far as I
understand, GL has a wiki, doesn't it?
Yep, that's alls I know :p
Happy New Year!
brynn
On 12/29/2019 11:08 PM, Victor Westmann wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was just taking a look at Blender's Wiki
> (https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Main_Page) and I was happy to identify
> they are using a similar wiki engine as we are. But I also noticed that
> they have a more modern (beautiful?) visual than we do. Is this
> something we are able to implement in our wiki as well?
>
> Besides this... are we going to revamp our wiki and centralize
> documentation material in it? Or are we going to readthedocs? Or are we
> going to centralize our efforts in the Gitlab wiki feature? Please let
> me know.
>
> I am really excited to read the article on how to write themes and icon
> sets for inkscape 1.x once it is ready.
>
> Thanks,
> Victor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape Docs mailing list -- inkscape-docs@lists.inkscape.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-docs-leave@lists.inkscape.org
>