Hi Brynn, thanks for noticing. I'll write to the user and ask him to remove the advertising. Keep an eye on it and remind me if it's still there in a week or so. (and I wish there were a way to *not* use my own mail address for this kind of thing - it doesn't look 'official', I don't want spam, and I wouldn't mind sharing this kind of mails with others in a more official kind of way (I'll be CC'ing Martin), without disclosing the recipient's mail address on a mailing list...) Regards, Maren Am 27.05.2015 um 16:05 schrieb Brynn:

Am 27.05.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Brynn: - That could be useful. I guess we'll get to that when the mailing system will be setup properly when the lists will be moved, or when the moderation system will be hooked up with mailing. - No, deletion works now :) (thanks, Martin ;) ) The problem is that we do not have any official rules posted anywhere, and thus can't expect people to adhere to them. I prefer to solve this kind of thing on a voluntary basis first, whenever possible. We can still delete uploads, or ban users when that seems unavoidable. Regards, Maren

Hi, just a couple of thoughts: Am 29.05.2015 um 11:07 schrieb Bryce Harrington: - Hooking up moderation with a shared sender email address, and copies of all communication sent to the other members, would probably be enough for the moderation part, I think. Moderators would get access to that automatically via the web interface. - For the more official mail addresses, I'm not sure what we need and what should be the rules. Maybe something like webmaster@, press@(?), contact@ (do we want that? We have the lists...), ... and have those accessible to the corresponding group of people who are sharing the responsibility for that area. There already is a contact form hidden on the website, which is linked from some of the registration pages, for the case that someone can't register. I think currently Martin gets those mails. Maybe even a more accessible contact form could be enough... I don't think we need personal email addresses, unless maybe the board members want their own to use for official communication ;) - I was hoping for the T&C from the SFC to contain those rules, but we might need a more user-understandable summary, too. To my understanding, uploads should: - conform to US family friendly standards (we might need to explain that, for the non-US people like me...) - not contain malware, spyware, adware or other things that can damage or block a downloader's computer - not be intended to damage the inkscape.org infrastructure - not contain advertising for anything but Free software / Free Culture - not be intended to discrimate against anyone, or to hurt anyone - not be abusing inkscape.org's infrastructure as a file-sharing platform for things totally unrelated with Inkscape - not infringe anyone's copyright - and probably more, like conform to US legislation On the positive side, I think, in general uploads should: - have a relation to Inkscape (made with it, made for it, have to do with organisation for the project, be an extension for it, teach it,...) - show other users what one can do with Inkscape - help other users to get the most out of Inkscape - be the most welcome if they use open licences, so others can learn more from them And then there are also the comments which need a set of rules. We currently link to the non-finished CoC... What are the others' ideas for mails, uploads, T&C, CoC and comments? Regards, Maren