On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:53 PM, helix84 <helix84@...150...> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 19:24, Leandro Regueiro
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:22 PM, helix84 <helix84@...150...> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 19:18, Leandro Regueiro
>> <leandro.regueiro@...5...> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Felipe Sanches <juca@...253...>
>>>> trademark is used to allow the consumers not to be fooled about the
>>>> of a product. By placing a trademark very similar to the Paramount
>>>> one in a DVD of another company, the consumers could potentially be
>>>> Thus it would potentially be a trademark violation. By doing it in
>>>> which is something from a totally distinct field, cannot fool anybody,
>>>> there is no problem in making such a reference.
>>> OK, I change from #2 to #3
>> Leandro, I think you might have misunderstood what Felipe was saying.
>> He said this case (#2) is not a trademark violation.
> You are implying that I change because I misunderstood what Felipe wrote :)
Yes, because you quoted him. It didn't make any other sense to me :)
I almost always reply to the last message of the thread.