18 Dec
2006
18 Dec
'06
12:23 a.m.
Jeffrey Brent McBeth <mcbeth@...1493...> writes:
I'm not sure what you mean be not scalable?
Sorry, I was thinking about invariance to transformations such as scaling, but it seems I'm wrong on this. It thought bezier somehow didn't maintain its exact mathematical shape during transformation.
I can't imagine someone wanting to use the non-uniform rational part of NURBS in a vector drawing tool
The reason for wanting NURBS is its local control property. I fit surfaces together and modifications on one side of the surface will deform the other side, so it will not line up exactly to another surface; there will be gaps. Also a good thing is being able to stitch together surfaces.
--
Esben Stien is b0ef@...2066... s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
sip:b0ef@ e e
jid:b0ef@ n n