11 Feb
2007
11 Feb
'07
11:06 p.m.
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:45:21 +0100 Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@...226...> wrote:
Dennis Heuer wrote:
I find this quite restricting. Please think about changing this.
BTW, in this specific case, the layer name seems to be stored as an id attribute, whose value HAS to be unique, so as it is this can't be changed.
Depends on how it must be usable. One could prepend the name of the parent dialog. This should make the hash value unique again. If the binding symbol may not be used in the name, there should be no problem for dialogs and other routines to find out the correct subname.
Dennis