bulia byak wrote:
On 12/8/06, Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@...226...> wrote:
Is there a reason to use the bounding box calculation with stroke? In any case, I would love to see a bounding box calculation without stroke (if I am really interested in the stroke I'll convert it to a path). As for markers, personally I think it would make sense to also leave them out of the bbox calculation.
It was without stroke before, and listed as a bug for a long time until finally fixed. I remember there were many problems with stroke-less bboxes, such as clipped bitmap export for example.
I can imagine you'd want to incorporate the stroke whenever you're interested in determining the area covered by the shape (when doing things like hit-testing, or indeed when exporting a bitmap), but when the size of the shape is displayed to the user (and when creating tilings for example) I think it makes a lot less sense.