ugly is subjective. what do find ugly about it? what do you find unusable about it and what do you mean by unusable? when you offer criticism it is also helpful to offer a solution. also notice the url of the site:
http://TEST.inkscapegallery.net.
sometimes plain, like your site, works for readability. i must say that the sideways text links on the inkscape site makes readability for old eyes like mine hard to read and i do find the site to be a bit busy, but ugly? no.
the image links don't help seo very much and i don't know if it is that important.
again, criticism is good only if you offer a better soultion.
regards,
dwain
The website http://test.inkscapegallery.net/ is UGLY. See attached.
It is totally unusable. So, I was just wondering if I had the correct website.
Ya'know for a mailing list that is all about images, I find every website recommended here is just plain ugly. I know some of it is because of HTML, but I thought by now people would be creative, within its limitations. Now I think I am wrong :( /_\
--
Just my 0.00000002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
+------------\
| Shangri La \
| 40,000 km /
+------------/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-user mailing list
Inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user