bulia byak wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:47:47 +0100, Jakub Steiner <jimmac@...446...> wrote:
Looking at it from the interface perspective, I'd call it a brush.
Yes, that's the best term.
You could convert an object into a brush, just like you can now convert an object into a pattern.
And adjust things like spacing, rotation, randomization...
Once you has a brush you could then use it on an object as another property (fill, stroke).
I don't think it can be used on fill, only on stroke. Actually, brush strokes will be their own kind of objects (implemented as SVG <g> with extension attrs) so they won't have any fill.
It looks like this has been requested here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1069685&gro...
You guys might add your thoughts to the RFE.
Jon
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Inkscape-user mailing list Inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user