data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/883ec/883ec7953e82b683622597c22618ab5072f68b5a" alt=""
Well, I'm not a develper but I am a user and it's inconvenient to have to copy and paste into a New mail dialog with the proper needed address in the To: line.
If you change it back I guess that's the way it is but as Inkscape grows and if this is the only way to work with folks "in the know" then users will not appreciate the inconvenience of having extra steps to take in order to reply to each post that have interest in knowing more about.
You might in the future want to set up a Developers and a Users mail list and in the Users mail list supply the direct address instead of having the reply to sending it to the last person that sent the responce to the mail list. Not everyone likes to have their mailboxes full of people that they don't know. I use MailWasher on WinXP Pro and if I don't know them then they get added to the "blacklist" which bounces the mail back to the sender!!
Just my 2ยข
Richard ;-)~
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Horkan" <horkana@...3...> To: "Inkscape User List" inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Inkscape-user] Reply-To
: : On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, MenTaLguY wrote: : : > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:32:21 -0500 (EST) : > From: MenTaLguY <mental@...32...> : > Reply-To: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net : > To: Inkscape User List inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net : > Subject: Re: [Inkscape-user] Reply-To : > : > On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ted Gould wrote: : > : > > On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 14:06, Bryce Harrington wrote: : > > > If we get 3 'ayes' I'll switch it over that way for a week, and then : > > > y'all can decide which way you'd prefer it permanently. : > > : > > aye, and for the devel list too! : > : > Is it too late to vote nay? : > : > I'm not in favor of making it extremely difficult to reply to ML messages : > privately. : : I vote Nay as well, exteremly strongly. : : this causes data loss, particularly annoying if I were to explicitly set : the Reply-To: to be something like both the list and me in case I want an : immediate reply and I'm on the list digest. : : Also if someone accidently sends an email it is better that accidentally : spam one person not the whole huge group of people on the list. : : mail clients like mutt and others support Reply to list : Reply All is also works well enough in just about every mail program : there is. : : I'll try and do a search and get back to you with a more thorough : explanation of why setting the reply-to is bad. : : If you wanted to give in to user demand for this on the user list I : wouldn't be happy but I wouldn't be surprised but I would be particularly : dissappointed if you went with it on the developer list. : : Sincerely : : Alan Horkan. : : : ------------------------------------------------------- : SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. : Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with : a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! : http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click : _______________________________________________ : Inkscape-user mailing list : Inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net : https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user :