12 Apr
2007
12 Apr
'07
3:18 a.m.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:11:36AM -0300, bulia byak wrote:
On 4/12/07, Jeffrey Brent McBeth <mcbeth@...1493...> wrote:
I think he means apply the transformation to the nodes.
So, if you have a transform like [2 0 1] [0 2 0] and a point of (1,2)
We could collapse this to: [3,4]
Yes, that is what I referred to. Try it with a path.
Wow, I hadn't noticed that before. Cool.
It would still be nice to be able to merge the possible transforms without having to convert to a path. (probably just the diagonal elements and the third column).
But, beggars can't be choosers.
Jeff
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hofstadter's Law states: It always takes longer than you expect, even when
you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------