
Swatches and the new F: S: O: widgets in the bottom left corner are great. The last thing I need to ctrl+shift+f is for the contour width. Is there a hope to have it somewhere near F: S: O: buttons?
Karol

On 4/11/06, Karol Krenski <pldmimooh@...954...> wrote:
Swatches and the new F: S: O: widgets in the bottom left corner are great. The last thing I need to ctrl+shift+f is for the contour width. Is there a hope to have it somewhere near F: S: O: buttons?
Eventually, yes. I just need to code that :)
-- bulia byak Inkscape. Draw Freely. http://www.inkscape.org

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 02:16:44 +0200, Karol Krenski <pldmimooh@...954...> wrote:
Swatches and the new F: S: O: widgets in the bottom left corner are great. The last thing I need to ctrl+shift+f is for the contour width. Is there a hope to have it somewhere near F: S: O: buttons?
Hi, I am looking to the left bottom corner in the yesterday's SVN build now and there is already an info about the stroke width. It is next to the colour of stroke and is visible if stroke is defined ;-)
cheers cornelius

Hey, i just want to ask you guyz what's the best solution to convert from SVG (made in inkscape) to WMF (or EMF) - that's 2 of vector formats that my Swish can import. I'm using ubuntu linux as my primary system, but i also have windowz on the other side if that could help me...
thanks! Jacek Brzeski www.numer9.pl
From MAILER-DAEMON Wed Apr 12 06:11:05 2006
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:36 +0200 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@...1792...> Message-Id: <200604121310.k3CDAaqE005857@...1792...> To: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="k3CDAaqE005857.1144847436/smtp5.clb.oleane.net" Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 Subject: [Inkscape-user] Returned mail: see transcript for details Sender: inkscape-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: inkscape-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user, mailto:inkscape-user-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe List-Id: Inkscape User Community <inkscape-user.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Post: mailto:inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: mailto:inkscape-user-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help List-Subscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user, mailto:inkscape-user-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe List-Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=inkscape-user
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
--k3CDAaqE005857.1144847436/smtp5.clb.oleane.net Content-Type: text/plain
The original message was received at Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:33 +0200 from localhost [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <2498@...1684...> (reason: 550 <2498@...1684...>: User unknown in local recipient table)
----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to [83.206.74.81]:
DATA
<<< 550 <2498@...1684...>: User unknown in local recipient table 550 5.1.1 <2498@...1684...>... User unknown <<< 554 Error: no valid recipients
--k3CDAaqE005857.1144847436/smtp5.clb.oleane.net Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp5.clb.oleane.net Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost Arrival-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:33 +0200
Final-Recipient: RFC822; 2498@...1684... Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; [83.206.74.81] Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 <2498@...1684...>: User unknown in local recipient table Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:35 +0200
--k3CDAaqE005857.1144847436/smtp5.clb.oleane.net Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from smtp5.clb.oleane.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.clb.oleane.net (antivirus) with ESMTP id k3CDAXqE005846 for <2498@...1684...>; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:33 +0200 Received: from smtp5.clb.oleane.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.clb.oleane.net (antispam) with ESMTP id k3CDAXU5005833 for <2498@...1684...>; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:33 +0200 Received: from ascom.fr (ALyon-152-1-49-201.w86-193.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.193.64.201]) by smtp5.clb.oleane.net with ESMTP id k3CDARj7005413 for <2498@...1684...>; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:28 +0200 Message-Id: <200604121310.k3CDARj7005413@...1792...> From: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net To: 2498@...1684... Subject: [SPAM] Re: Extended Mail System Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:09:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: xxxxx
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
------------------ Virus Warning Message (on smtp5)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.P in file msg.pif The uncleanable file is deleted.
---------------------------------------------------------
------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
For more details see the attachment.
------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
------------------ Virus Warning Message (on smtp5)
msg.pif is removed from here because it contains a virus.
--------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016--
--k3CDAaqE005857.1144847436/smtp5.clb.oleane.net--

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:14:42 +0200 Jacek Brzeski <jacek@...1687...> wrote:
i just want to ask you guyz what's the best solution to convert from SVG (made in inkscape) to WMF (or EMF) - that's 2 of vector formats that my Swish can import. I'm using ubuntu linux as my primary system, but i also have windowz on the other side if that could help me...
OpenOffice can export either to EMF and WMF but I have no experience with it.
Cheerz Lars

Lars Behrens wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:14:42 +0200 Jacek Brzeski <jacek@...1687...> wrote:
i just want to ask you guyz what's the best solution to convert from SVG (made in inkscape) to WMF (or EMF) - that's 2 of vector formats that my Swish can import. I'm using ubuntu linux as my primary system, but i also have windowz on the other side if that could help me...
OpenOffice can export either to EMF and WMF but I have no experience with it.
I coulnd't find that option in my openoffice. And i can't import SVG made in Inkscape into OO, do i need some plugin for that?
regards, #9 www.numer9.pl
From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Apr 13 03:56:09 2006
From: postmaster@...1724... To: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:55:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C6501B19D9E60C0000E581mailprx3.se?euro" X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 00000001 - 80040546 Message-ID: <odyiRNyRv00000a5a@...1739...> X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name Subject: [Inkscape-user] Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Sender: inkscape-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: inkscape-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user, mailto:inkscape-user-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe List-Id: Inkscape User Community <inkscape-user.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Post: mailto:inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: mailto:inkscape-user-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help List-Subscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user, mailto:inkscape-user-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe List-Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=inkscape-user
This is a MIME-formatted message. Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program.
--9B095B5ADSN=_01C6501B19D9E60C0000E581mailprx3.se?euro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
bush@...1738...
--9B095B5ADSN=_01C6501B19D9E60C0000E581mailprx3.se?euro Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns;mailprx3.se-europe.kronospan.int Received-From-MTA: dns;mailsweeperpr.kronospan.sk Arrival-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:55:50 +0200
Original-Recipient: rfc822;bush@...1738... Final-Recipient: rfc822;bush@...1738... Action: failed Status: 5.1.1
--9B095B5ADSN=_01C6501B19D9E60C0000E581mailprx3.se?euro Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from mailsweeperpr.kronospan.sk ([192.168.110.2]) by mailprx3.se-europe.kronospan.int with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:55:50 +0200 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (unverified) by mailsweeperpr.kronospan.sk (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.3) with ESMTP id <T779fbba749c0a86e02b54@...1726...> for <bush@...1738...>; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:56:23 +0200 Message-ID: <T779fbba749c0a86e02b54@...1726...> From: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net To: bush@...1738... Subject: Hello Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 01:54:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_899855BD.92EE4894" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Return-Path: inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Apr 2006 10:55:50.0946 (UTC) FILETIME=[D4099820:01C65EE8]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0013_899855BD.92EE4894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MAILsweeper for SMTP 5.2 message:
The attachment(s) in this message might been infected with a virus. Attachment(s) has been removed from the message.
For more details, contact your local IT support.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAILsweeper for SMTP 5.2 message:
The message has contained executable attachment(s). Current system policy doesn`t allow executable attachments. Attachment(s) has been removed from the message.
For more details, contact your local IT support.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
------=_NextPart_000_0013_899855BD.92EE4894-- --9B095B5ADSN=_01C6501B19D9E60C0000E581mailprx3.se?euro--

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:36:36 +0200 Jacek Brzeski <jacek@...1687...> wrote:
I coulnd't find that option in my openoffice.
Which version? I have 2.0.1 there it's under "File" > "Export"
And i can't import SVG made in Inkscape into OO, do i need some plugin for that?
Hmm, not possible here, too. Sorry had just been looking for the export.
But I tried in KOffice, ist works there with 1.4.1:
You can open eps and then export to "Windows Meta File". As a test, then opening that file with OOo shows a reasonable result.
HTH!
Cheerz Lars

Lars Behrens wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:36:36 +0200 Jacek Brzeski <jacek@...1687...> wrote:
I coulnd't find that option in my openoffice.
Which version? I have 2.0.1 there it's under "File" > "Export"
And i can't import SVG made in Inkscape into OO, do i need some plugin for that?
Hmm, not possible here, too. Sorry had just been looking for the export.
But I tried in KOffice, ist works there with 1.4.1:
You can open eps and then export to "Windows Meta File". As a test, then opening that file with OOo shows a reasonable result.
HTH!
thanks, i'm using gnome, but i guess i'll try kde for a while... :)
i hope svg will raise into strenght and become standard in every vector app...
regards, Jacek Brzeski www.numer9.pl

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:36:36 +0200, Jacek Brzeski wrote:
Lars Behrens wrote:
OpenOffice can export either to EMF and WMF but I have no experience with it.
I coulnd't find that option in my openoffice. And i can't import SVG made in Inkscape into OO, do i need some plugin for that?
Are you using OpenOffice Draw? SVG Import is available here: http://www.ipd.uka.de/~hauma/svg-import/
Regards, Helge

One problem with importing Inkscape SVG's into OO is that Inkscape SVG's are not standard SVG's. There is an option in Inkscape to save an SVG file as a "plain SVG file". Try doing that. you might be able to import the resulting SVG into OO.
On 4/13/06, Helge Hielscher <hhielscher@...89...> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:36:36 +0200, Jacek Brzeski wrote:
Lars Behrens wrote:
OpenOffice can export either to EMF and WMF but I have no experience with it.
I coulnd't find that option in my openoffice. And i can't import SVG made in Inkscape into OO, do i need some plugin for that?
Are you using OpenOffice Draw? SVG Import is available here: http://www.ipd.uka.de/~hauma/svg-import/
Regards, Helge
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&da... _______________________________________________ Inkscape-user mailing list Inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:46:29PM -0400, Edward Hume wrote:
One problem with importing Inkscape SVG's into OO is that Inkscape SVG's are not standard SVG's.
In what way have you found Inkscape's default SVG to not adhere to the SVG standard?
Bryce

I don't know how to judge between adherence and non-adherence to standards.
It's not me. It's my software. Various apps, from GIMP to Paintshop Pro, take in SVG's made with sodipodi, for example, but choke or make bad images with Inkscape SVG's. I quit outputting SVG's and simply have Inkscape export PNG's to work on in bitmapped image editors now.
After all, Inkscape itself differentiates between Inkscape SVG and "plain" SVG. If there is no difference, why the output option?
I perhaps wrote in error when I distinguished between Inkscape and "standard" SVG's I should have said "plain" SVG's instead. I'm not sure there is a standard SVG yet.
Finally, do recall that I was suggesting a way to make an SVG file that would be accepted by another app. In the past, I have had better success with the plain option than with the Inkscape option.
On 4/14/06, Bryce Harrington <bryce@...983...> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:46:29PM -0400, Edward Hume wrote:
One problem with importing Inkscape SVG's into OO is that Inkscape SVG's are not standard SVG's.
In what way have you found Inkscape's default SVG to not adhere to the SVG standard?
Bryce
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&da... _______________________________________________ Inkscape-user mailing list Inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user

On 4/14/06, Edward Hume <edhume@...155...> wrote:
After all, Inkscape itself differentiates between Inkscape SVG and "plain" SVG. If there is no difference, why the output option?
In part, it's there exactly for this: to care for broken programs such as those you listed :)
Other reasons for using "plain SVG" might include file size reduction, hiding the fact that the image was done in Inkscape, etc.
-- bulia byak Inkscape. Draw Freely. http://www.inkscape.org

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 06:28:25PM -0400, Edward Hume wrote:
It's not me. It's my software. Various apps, from GIMP to Paintshop Pro, take in SVG's made with sodipodi, for example, but choke or make bad images with Inkscape SVG's. I quit outputting SVG's and simply have Inkscape export PNG's to work on in bitmapped image editors now.
Yes, it's unfortunate but true that despite SVG being a true standardized format, there are few applications that are 100% compliant. Even Inkscape is not 100% compliant, although it is definitely our goal to become so one day.
As a general rule, Inkscape's SVG is closer to compliance than many other (even commercial) applications, so many times the issues are due to issues with the other program. If you get really curious about the incompatibilities, a good judge is the program Batik. It's probably the most compliant program out there, so if there is a difference between Inkscape and Batik, we generally assume Batik is correct.
Of course, all this is neither here nor there for users, who just want the programs to interoperate...
After all, Inkscape itself differentiates between Inkscape SVG and "plain" SVG. If there is no difference, why the output option?
I think a good way to think about Inkscape SVG and "plain" SVG is like between a color photo and a black and white photo. The B&W photo will display correctly on a printer, its file size will be smaller, and you may have fewer issues using it in various graphics programs. But despite all these benefits, it doesn't have color!
Similarly, "plain" SVG will display correctly in more programs, be smaller in size, and have fewer issues, but it's still "less" than the original Inkscape SVG.
Finally, do recall that I was suggesting a way to make an SVG file that would be accepted by another app. In the past, I have had better success with the plain option than with the Inkscape option.
Yup, that was good advice you gave; this is exactly why the "plain" SVG was included. Hopefully this thread was also useful to help in explaining that the issue isn't due to Inkscape not being sufficiently standard compared with other programs, but in fact the opposite.
Also, if anyone *does* find an area where Inkscape is failing to meet the SVG standard, those are considered very critically important bugs (almost as critical as crashes or data loss), so please make sure they're listed in our bug tracker.
Bryce

--- Bryce Harrington <bryce@...983...> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 06:28:25PM -0400, Edward Hume wrote:
It's not me. It's my software. Various apps, from GIMP to Paintshop Pro, take in SVG's made with sodipodi, for example, but choke or
make
bad images with Inkscape SVG's. I quit outputting SVG's and simply have Inkscape export PNG's to work on in bitmapped image editors
now.
Yes, it's unfortunate but true that despite SVG being a true standardized format, there are few applications that are 100% compliant. Even Inkscape is not 100% compliant, although it is definitely our goal to become so one day.
As a general rule, Inkscape's SVG is closer to compliance than many other (even commercial) applications, so many times the issues are due to issues with the other program. If you get really curious about the incompatibilities, a good judge is the program Batik. It's probably the most compliant program out there, so if there is a difference between Inkscape and Batik, we generally assume Batik is correct.
Of course, all this is neither here nor there for users, who just want the programs to interoperate...
After all, Inkscape itself differentiates between Inkscape SVG and "plain" SVG. If there is no difference, why the output option?
I think a good way to think about Inkscape SVG and "plain" SVG is like between a color photo and a black and white photo. The B&W photo will display correctly on a printer, its file size will be smaller, and you may have fewer issues using it in various graphics programs. But despite all these benefits, it doesn't have color!
Similarly, "plain" SVG will display correctly in more programs, be smaller in size, and have fewer issues, but it's still "less" than the original Inkscape SVG.
I think a better comparison would be between a PSD of an image and a JPG or PNG. THey'll both look the same when you load em in photoshop (assuming you used decent compression settings), but as soon as ou try to edit the jpg you'll find you've lost all the usefull stuff like layer info. That being said, theres a lot more places you can use a jpg than a psd, if your loading it inot word or whatever the psd wont work. Both inkscape and plain SVGs should render identically if the viewer can cope with the file, (its not visually "less" which is why i dont like the b/w analogy, the less is purely an editability/compatability thing) Saving as plain does increase the places it will render at all tho.
Cheers
Sim
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

On 4/13/06, Edward Hume <edhume@...155...> wrote:
One problem with importing Inkscape SVG's into OO is that Inkscape SVG's are not standard SVG's.
Yes they are. All standard-conforming SVG renderers show them exactly as they are in Inkscape; if they do not, it's a bug and we fix it (usually quite fast).
-- bulia byak Inkscape. Draw Freely. http://www.inkscape.org

On 4/13/06, Edward Hume <edhume@...155...> wrote:
One problem with importing Inkscape SVG's into OO is that Inkscape SVG's are not standard SVG's.
Yes they are. All standard-conforming SVG renderers show them exactly as they are in Inkscape; if they do not, it's a bug and we fix it (usually quite fast).
To elaborate, the "Save as plain SVG" function doesn't make the SVG "more standard", rather it strips out otherwise valid SVG content from your files that sometimes cause problems in other programs which are less standards conformant than Inkscape.
For example, some programs choke on XML comments, others are unable to handle SVG metadata, etc.
Usually if you find a case where a program cannot take regular Inkscape SVG, but can take the plain SVG, it often just indicates that other program is incomplete in its support for SVG.
Bryce

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:11:38 -0700, Bryce Harrington <bryce@...983...> wrote:
To elaborate, the "Save as plain SVG" function doesn't make the SVG "more standard", rather it strips out otherwise valid SVG content from your files that sometimes cause problems in other programs which are less standards conformant than Inkscape.
There are also non-SVG elements used in SVG-conformant ways. Conforming SVG UAs should (generally speaking) ignore the non-SVG elements they don't understand, although not all do.
-mental

On 4/12/06, Josef Vybiral <newsgroups@...1337...> wrote:
I am looking to the left bottom corner in the yesterday's SVN build now and there is already an info about the stroke width. It is next to the colour of stroke and is visible if stroke is defined ;-)
Yes, it is displayed there already, but I also want to add a way to _change_ it right there.
-- bulia byak Inkscape. Draw Freely. http://www.inkscape.org

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:46:29 +0200, bulia byak <buliabyak@...155...> wrote:
On 4/12/06, Josef Vybiral <newsgroups@...1337...> wrote:
I am looking to the left bottom corner in the yesterday's SVN build now and there is already an info about the stroke width. It is next to the colour of stroke and is visible if stroke is defined ;-)
Yes, it is displayed there already, but I also want to add a way to _change_ it right there.
Then, wow, that would be nice.

On Apr 12, 2006, at 7:03 AM, Josef Vybiral wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:46:29 +0200, bulia byak <buliabyak@...155...> wrote:
On 4/12/06, Josef Vybiral <newsgroups@...1337...> wrote:
I am looking to the left bottom corner in the yesterday's SVN build now and there is already an info about the stroke width. It is next to the colour of stroke and is visible if stroke is defined ;-)
Yes, it is displayed there already, but I also want to add a way to _change_ it right there.
Then, wow, that would be nice.
Yeah.
Bulia rocks!
participants (11)
-
Bryce Harrington
-
bulia byak
-
Edward Hume
-
Helge Hielscher
-
Jacek Brzeski
-
John Cliff
-
Jon A. Cruz
-
Josef Vybiral
-
Karol Krenski
-
Lars Behrens
-
MenTaLguY