Statically-linked linux version of 0.44?
Hi folks,
Is there any chance of getting a statically-linked, rpm-packaged version of inkscape 0.44? I'm missing the appropriate versions of libcairo, libglitz and libpangocairo.
Thanks in advance, Bryan
Hi list,
Does anyone install the RPM packages on Fedora Core 4 ? I am having dependencies problems and would like to use rpm to new versions and for safe uninstalling.
depfiles:
[root@...1021... Desktop]# rpm -ivh inkscape-0.44-0.i686.rpm erro: Failed dependencies: libcairo.so.2 is needed by inkscape-0.44-0.i686 libglitz.so.1 is needed by inkscape-0.44-0.i686 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 is needed by inkscape-0.44-0.i686
Regards Ezequias
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote:
Hi list,
Does anyone install the RPM packages on Fedora Core 4 ? I am having dependencies problems and would like to use rpm to new versions and for safe uninstalling.
Ezequias, a proper RPM for Fedora is on its way for Extras: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196572 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2006-June/msg02242.htm...
I am having the same problem on FC4.
Regards Ezequias
Bryan K. Wright escreveu:
Hi folks,
Is there any chance of getting a statically-linked, rpm-packaged version of inkscape 0.44? I'm missing the appropriate versions of libcairo, libglitz and libpangocairo.
Thanks in advance, Bryan
On Monday 26 June 2006 15:25, Bryan K. Wright wrote:
Is there any chance of getting a statically-linked, rpm-packaged version of inkscape 0.44? I'm missing the appropriate versions of libcairo, libglitz and libpangocairo.
Well, yes and no. The problem is that until a few months ago the RPMs were built against GTK+ 2.4 as per the requirements, until it didn't build anymore. I had to upgrade to GTK+ 2.6, which introduces bogus dependencies on pangocairo and glitz, among others.
So I tried to statically link those libs, but to no avail. They build and install but don't link.
I then tried appbuild, which is capable of removing bogus dependencies, but the compilation fails and I couldn't figure out why.
I did then some more compiling, until I had no longer much time to do something about it and then released the RPMs with the unresolved dependencies. I thought it was better than nothing and was still hoping to fix the issue in a matter of days. But it's more complicated than I thought.
So, to answer your question, progress can be achieved if someone is willing to give a hand.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:43:30PM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Lemaire wrote:
On Monday 26 June 2006 15:25, Bryan K. Wright wrote:
Is there any chance of getting a statically-linked, rpm-packaged version of inkscape 0.44? I'm missing the appropriate versions of libcairo, libglitz and libpangocairo.
Well, yes and no. The problem is that until a few months ago the RPMs were built against GTK+ 2.4 as per the requirements, until it didn't build anymore. I had to upgrade to GTK+ 2.6, which introduces bogus dependencies on pangocairo and glitz, among others.
Hmm, well let's start from the origin - why did it fail to build against GTK+ 2.4? Even now we still have the requirement that it build against 2.4, so if it does not, it seems this is the thing to fix.
Bryce
So I tried to statically link those libs, but to no avail. They build and install but don't link.
I then tried appbuild, which is capable of removing bogus dependencies, but the compilation fails and I couldn't figure out why.
I did then some more compiling, until I had no longer much time to do something about it and then released the RPMs with the unresolved dependencies. I thought it was better than nothing and was still hoping to fix the issue in a matter of days. But it's more complicated than I thought.
So, to answer your question, progress can be achieved if someone is willing to give a hand.
-- Jean-Fran?ois Lemaire
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&da... _______________________________________________ Inkscape-user mailing list Inkscape-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user
Bryce Harrington <bryce@...983...> writes:
Hmm, well let's start from the origin - why did it fail to build against GTK+ 2.4? Even now we still have the requirement that it build against 2.4, so if it does not, it seems this is the thing to fix.
I think this is handled here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.inkscape.devel/16922/focus=16922
Cheers, Colin
participants (6)
-
Bryan K. Wright
-
Bryce Harrington
-
Colin Marquardt
-
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha
-
Jean-François Lemaire
-
Nicu Buculei