On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 09:14 -0700, Joshua A. Andler wrote:
I think that for us to properly vote, we need something more than
vague "work on our text tool". Do we get to decide what exactly is
worked on? Do we get to determine when the work is "done" (good enough
and not too buggy)? Is anyone on the hook for bug fixing after the fact?
Things of that nature.
Yes, most of the information is here:
I don't remember who put the proposal together, but I think that Bulia
was involved in specifying it.
I believe that we have to accept the work as being good, but there is no
commitment to fix bugs after it's been accepted.