Looks very good, Martin!
I'd vote *B*, with the following minor remarks:
In the current redaction, "member" is first defined as someone who
contributed, then the term "active member" is used for vetted member
Hence, I would
-> in Definitions, replace the first def with those two definitions:
/- An Contributor is a person who is actively contributing to the
Inkscape project or who has contributed to the project in the past. [1] //
//- An Inkscape member is a Contributor who has been added to the member
list and not been removed from it/
-> s/active Inkscape member/Inkscape member/ (to follow on the definitions)
-> 5b "The list of Inkscape members"
-> 4c s/contributor/Contributor (if added to the defs)
4: "members maybe" -> "member may be"
4a: s/infraction/violation/ ?
5c: remove "[3]" ([1] intended here maybe ?)
Bests,
--
Marc
On 9/23/21 8:19 PM, Martin Owens wrote:
> Dear Leadership Committee,
>
> As discussed; the two week consultation is finished. Thanks to everyone
> who came to the meetings, commented here on the mailing list and sent
> private messages. I've distilled everything down into a internal policy
> document which we can now vote on.
>
> The preference from other board members was to put this strait to a
> vote since we've talked about this for a long time. So hopefully this
> represents a balanced and fair membership process.
>
> See the attached draft policy document that we are voting on here.
>
> Ballot
>
> a. Adopt the internal membership policy as is.
> b. Adopt it after these minor modifications.
> c. Do not adopt this policy, or anything like it.
> d. Do something else.
>
> Best Regards, Martin Owens
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
