On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 14:44 -0700, Josh Andler wrote:
Do you have a link to the thread so I don't have to ask you a bunch of
questions I could get answered elsewhere? :)
If at some point we're going to add any official language which could
be construed as a legal statement (even if plainly worded), we should
probably run it by Tony and/or Bradley at Software Freedom Conservancy
since we are already a member and they advise us on all of the other
similar language we use to officially represent the project. By no
means am I against utilizing the SFLC for the broader goal of common
language for the community, I would just personally feel better if we
were to have SFC give approval before it represents our project.
I though it was too obvious to mention to pass it over the SFC.