On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 14:56 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:16:09PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 22:30 +0200, Johan Engelen wrote:
> > Today I discovered this page:
> > http://inkscape.org/conservancy/
> > I think it needs updating or should be archived/deleted?
> Wow, I remember that! It's verbose, I'm guessing Bryce wrote it ;-)
If it's verbose it must be mine. :-)
I suppose there's a few salvagable sentences but it's mostly far out of
date and need of overhaul.
I started to work on this last year but never got very far with it.
> > Somewhere it should say that we are a member of the
> > couldn't find it in any case) and we should have a link to the
> > conservancy's website too. Could be something really simple, like a
> > one-line sentence on this page here:
> > http://staging.inkscape.org/en/about/
> > What are your thoughts?
> Either that or even something in the small print at the bottom of the
> page. I don't have strong feelings either way, but I do feel like we
> should mention our association somewhere so that people know.
Agreed, that's probably sufficient. I think if I wasn't on the board
I'd probably want to know more details about what we do and how to
contact us. It might also be valuable to have our voting process
publically documented somewhere, but we can take care of that next time
we do a vote.
I have added a couple of sentences to the About page. I agree we need to
describe our organizational structure somewhere including a copy of our
agreement with SFC.
Anyway, +1 for dropping the page in favor of something simple for
If anyone wants to write up a replacement to explain to the public who
we are, go for it; I'll be happy to copyedit and offer ideas.
Let's see if I can't come up with something in the next week or two.