On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:22:45AM -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Bryce Harrington wrote at 15:30 (EST) on Wednesday:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:50:28AM -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>> Bryce, thanks for the details on the GSoC payments. I'll reach out to
>> each mentor and ask them what they want to do. I have all their email
>> addresses except for: Krzysztof KosiĆski
> When you ask them, can you also ask them if they want the 10% to go to
> Conservancy?
Unfortunately, I've already sent the emails to ask (I sent them in
parallel to the email you're responding to above). I very much
appreciate the gesture here, but I'd also much rather Inkscape make an
overall decision in this regard and let it be the rule we use for all
income. I hope that Inkscape won't have any objections to it, and would
Thats too bad. Indeed there are objections voiced to this.
be happy to answer any additional questions you have.
One other question that came up was if this income would include
"pass-through" funds, such as situations we've had in the past where
Google or some other organization sponsored travel or funded work by a
developer by donating it to Inkscape via the Conservancy, and then the
developer was paid via Inkscape. Would the rule cover this type of
income as well?
Bryce