Hi,
Is the fossology report generated in Word format? Is it possible to
generate it in either plain text or in a format that is an open standard?
Unfortunately I am unable to open it in LibreOffice.
As for the libraries included in windows bundles, please see the following
for more information:
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Kanefeyer, Jan
<jan.kanefeyer@...76...>wrote:
Hi,
Attached you will find our fossology scan report. The report lists all
licenses and the files where the licenses were found.
In the meantime we checked the installer and found another issue. There
are a lot of dll’s and executables (see attached binary list) which cannot
be matched with the provided source code. E.g.: There is the file
freetype6.dll. But we do not get any search result for freetype in the
sources.
Where does these binaries come from?
Are these files taken from other OSS? If yes, can you provide the licenses
and sources for these OSS?
Regards
Jan
*Von:* Josh Andler [mailto:scislac@...23...]
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2014 17:22
*An:* Ted Gould
*Cc:* Kanefeyer, Jan; bryce@...2...; goejendaag@...65...;
tavmjong@...47...; Vogler, Andrea; Inkscape Board
*Betreff:* Re: license incompatibility in inkscape 0.48.4
More detailed info would definitely be helpful. I've also gone ahead and
added the board list via CC since this was intended to go to the board.
Just to throw out there, I am aware of a couple things. At least Jon Cruz
(I believe also Felipe Sanches) has committed multi-licensed code at some
point. At least some of the MPL was also licensed as GPL. Regarding the
GPL2 vs 3 issue, we still haven't run across anything that explicitly
states GPL2 only and what is there says GPL2 or later... so according to
discussions with SFC, we are technically still a GPL2 project just with
some GPL3 code.
One example of a multi-licensed file can be viewed at
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/view/head:/src/e...
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Ted Gould <ted@...1...> wrote:
Hello Jan,
I personally am not aware of any licensing issues that we have in
Inkscape, thanks for bringing this to our attention! Do you have a report
that has more detail of which files/directories are which license so we can
look into it with more detail?
Thanks,
Ted
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 12:43 +0000, Kanefeyer, Jan wrote:
Hello Inkscape board,
We are planning to use inkscape. Thus we scanned the source code of
inkscape 0.48.4 for OSS licenses. So we found out that inscape 0.48.4
includes the following licenses:
GPL 2.0
GPL 3.0
LGPL 2.1
MPL 1.1
Apache License 2.0
creativecommons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
BSD-2-Clause
BSD-3-Clause
MIT
Zlib
W3C
Unfortunately there are license incompatibilities between some on the
licenses. E.g.:
Apache 2.0 <-> GPL 2.0
GPL 2.0 <-> GPL 3.0
MPL 1.1 <-> GPL 2.0 + GPL 3.0 + LGPL 2.1 + Apache License 2.0
This leads to a serious problem: The creator of the code published under
Apache License 2.0 can prohibit a publishing of his code under GPL 2.0. So
we are not allowed to publish it at all.
So here are my questions:
Is the community aware of this problem?
Is there a general statement regarding this topic available?
Are there any counter measures planned/implemented?
Kind Regards
Jan Kanefeyer
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jan Kanefeyer
Siemens AG
Infrastructure & Cities Sector
Smart Grid Division
Energy Automation
IC SG EA SOL D 1
Humboldtstr. 59
90459 Nürnberg, Deutschland
Tel: +49 911 433-8044
*mailto:jan.kanefeyer@...76... <jan.kanefeyer@...76...>*
<jan.kanefeyer@...76...>
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard
Cromme; Vorstand: Joe Kaeser, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Klaus Helmrich,
Hermann Requardt, Siegfried Russwurm, Ralf P. Thomas; Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Berlin und München, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin
Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, München, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322