On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Karen Sandler <karen@...41...> wrote: Understood. The donation approach sounds MUCH more palatable and appealing in fact. We do feel we owe you all, and we want to show our appreciation. We will let you know what we settle on, but I would say having language in the FSA to deal with it rather than it being on our honor is probably not the best approach. I'm not surprised. I probably also didn't scrutinize things as much the first time I read through it. Thank you for the clarification. This put me more at ease personally, but there is kind of part of me that wants to ask is it possible to distill it down with a leading statement that says something to the effect of "For the protection of of SFC and the Project, if our relationship is to be terminated it needs to be inline with all related tax obligations and the public interest, which entails:" It did, as always, thank you for your time and patience for those of use who are protective and somewhat concerned oldtimers with the project. Cheers, Josh